IN THE
AT
STATE
OF
)
v. ) CASE NO. T0028053
)
John Davis Lee II )
________________________________________________________________________
DEFENSE MOTION #____
MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT
________________________________________________________________________
COMES
THE DEFENDANT and moves this Honorable Court that the statement of defendant be
suppressed. Defendant sets as cause therefor that at
the time of de facto arrest, the
defendant made certain statements to the arresting officer after the time he
was in de facto arrest and without
being advised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86
S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). A statement made
by the defendant without Miranda, against interest, is
inadmissible at trial. State v. Stearns 620 S.W.2d 92
(Tenn. Crim. App. 1981), State v. Williams 657
S.W.2d 405 (
Defendant
further cites in support thereof Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________________
John Lee, pro se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
on this ____ day of _______________, ______.
______________________
John Davis Lee II, pro se