|
Lost News Archive Because Censorship is MASS MURDER Pedophile Jewish Rabbis Suck Dick and Kill Babies During Babylonian Circumcison Ritual, Media Presstitutes Mute REALITY CHECK: Semite. "A 'Semite' is any person living in that area, including Arabs and Christians. It's time we start talking about 'The Other AntiSemitism'. A Semite is NOT a Jew living in America or Europe." See also: Khazaria.com Jew Madoff Stole More Than All Other Criminals Combined City Questions Circumcision Ritual After Baby Dies Dick sucking now classified as "religious freedom" By ANDY NEWMAN
A circumcision ritual practiced by some Orthodox Jews has alarmed city health officials, who say it may have led to three cases of herpes - one of them fatal - in infants. But after months of meetings with Orthodox leaders, city officials have been unable to persuade them to abandon the practice. The city's intervention has angered many Orthodox leaders, and the issue has left the city struggling to balance its mandate to protect public health with the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom. "This is a very delicate area, so to speak," said Health Commissioner Thomas R. Frieden. The practice is known as oral suction, or in Hebrew, metzitzah b'peh: after removing the foreskin of the penis, the practitioner, or mohel, sucks the blood from the wound to clean it. It became a health issue after a boy in Staten Island and twins in Brooklyn, circumcised by the same mohel in 2003 and 2004, contracted Type-1 herpes. Most adults carry the disease, which causes the common cold sore, but it can be life-threatening for infants. One of the twins died. Since February, the mohel, Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, 57, has been under court order not to perform the ritual in New York City while the health department is investigating whether he spread the infection to the infants. Pressure from Orthodox leaders on the issue led Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and health officials to meet with them on Aug. 11. The mayor's comments on his radio program the next day seemed meant to soothe all parties and not upset a group that can be a formidable voting bloc: "We're going to do a study, and make sure that everybody is safe and at the same time, it is not the government's business to tell people how to practice their religion." The health department, after the meeting, reiterated that it did not intend to ban or regulate oral suction. But Dr. Frieden has said that the city is taking this approach partly because any broad rule would be virtually unenforceable. Circumcision generally takes place in private homes. Dr. Frieden said the department regarded herpes transmission via oral suction as "somewhat inevitable to occur as long as this practice continues, if at a very low rate." The use of suction to stop bleeding dates back centuries and is mentioned in the Talmud. The safety of direct oral contact has been questioned since the 19th century, and many Orthodox and nearly all non-Orthodox Jews have abandoned it. Dr. Frieden said he hoped the rabbis would voluntarily switch to suctioning the blood through a tube, an alternative endorsed by the Rabbinical Council of America, the largest group of Orthodox rabbis.
But the most traditionalist groups, including many Hasidic sects in New York, consider oral suction integral to God's covenant with the Jews requiring circumcision, and they have no intention of stopping. "The Orthodox Jewish community will continue the practice that has been practiced for over 5,000 years," said Rabbi David Niederman of the United Jewish Organization in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, after the meeting with the mayor. "We do not change. And we will not change." David Zwiebel, executive vice president of Agudath Israel, an umbrella organization of Orthodox Jews, said that metzitzah b'peh is probably performed more than 2,000 times a year in New York City. The potential risks of oral suction, however, are not confined to Orthodox communities. Dr. Frieden said in March that the health department had fielded several calls from panicked non-Orthodox parents who had hired Hasidic mohels unaware of what their services entailed. Defenders of oral suction say there is no proof that it spreads herpes at all. They say that mohels use antiseptic mouthwash before performing oral suction, and that the known incidence of herpes among infants who have undergone it is minuscule. (The city's health department recorded cases in 1988 and 1998, though doctors in New York, as in most states, are not required to report neonatal herpes.) Dr. Kenneth I. Glassberg, past president of the New York section of the American Urological Association and director of pediatric urology at Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian, said that while he found oral suction "personally displeasing," he did not recommend that rabbis stop using it. "If I knew something caused a problem from a medical point of view," said Dr. Glassberg, whose private practice includes many Hasidic families, "I would recommend against it." But Rabbi Moshe Tendler, a microbiologist and professor of Talmud and medical ethics at Yeshiva University, said that metzitzah b'peh violates Jewish law. "The rule that's above all rules in the Torah is that you cannot expose or accept a risk to health unless there is true justification for it," said Dr. Tendler, co-author of a 2004 article in the journal Pediatrics that said direct contact posed a serious risk of infection. "Now there have been several cases of herpes in the metro area," he said. "Whether it can be directly associated with this mohel nobody knows. All we're talking about now is presumptive evidence, and on that alone it would be improper according to Jewish law to do oral suction." The inconsistent treatment of Rabbi Fischer himself indicates the confusion metzitzah b'peh has sown among health authorities, who typically regulate circumcisions by doctors but not religious practitioners. In Rockland County, where Rabbi Fischer lives in the Hasidic community of Monsey, he has been barred from performing oral suction. But the state health department retracted a request it had made to Rabbi Fischer to stop the practice. And in New Jersey, where Rabbi Fischer has done some of his 12,000 circumcisions, the health authorities have been silent. Rabbi Fischer's lawyer, Mark J. Kurzmann, said that absent conclusive proof that the rabbi had spread herpes, he should be allowed to continue the practice. Rabbi Fischer said through Mr. Kurzmann that the twin who died and the Staten Island boy both had herpes-like rashes before they were circumcised and were seen by a pediatrician who approved their circumcision. The health department declined to comment on its investigation.
|
|
Rabbis Defend Controversial Circumcision Practice to City Health Officials FoxNews.com
A two-week-old infant died at a Brooklyn hospital in September after contracting herpes through a controversial religious circumcision ritual, the New York Daily News reported. A spokeswoman for the city Medical Examiner told the newspaper that the unidentified baby boy died September 28, 2011, at Maimonides Hospital. The official cause of death was listed as “disseminated herpes simplex virus Type 1, complicating ritual circumcision with oral suction.” As part of the ultra-orthodox Jewish circumcision ritual—known as metzitzah b’peh—the rabbi or mohel removes blood from the wound with his mouth. The brit milah (pronounced bris), otherwise known as circumcision, is a rite of passage in the Jewish faith, though different groups follow different sets of procedures. The Rabbinical Council of America endorses the practice of using a sterile glass tube between the mohel’s mouth and the baby’s wound for the more orthodox metzitzah b’peh procedure. For less conservative Jews, the baby’s skin only comes into contact with surgical tools. It is unclear who performed the circumcision, according to the Daily News. In 2004, another baby died after contracting herpes from a rabbi in Rockland County, N.Y. City health officials have denounced the ritual, saying it carries “inherent risks” for babies. Click here to read more from the New York Daily News. |
|
Bloomberg On Circumcision Laws: “We have an obligation to keep people alive”
by Laura Nahmias NEW YORK CITY -- Wilder Fleming filed the following report: Mayor Michael Bloomberg responded this morning to city rabbis’ threats of legal action if the city goes through with a proposal to restrict a controversial Orthodox Jewish circumcision practice. “We have an obligation to keep people alive and safe and the courts have held that up repeatedly,” Bloomberg said today at a press conference outside the City Clerk’s office. His comments came in response to Orthodox rabbis, who defended the practice of “metzitzah b’peh” yesterday at a New York City Health Department public hearing. In “metzitzah b’peh,” a mohel uses his mouth to suck blood from the circumcision wound, a ritual that has led to the transmission of herpes to some infants, in a few cases leading to their deaths. Rabbi and mohel A. Romi Cohn defended the practice yesterday, saying rabbinical law guidelines are “much stricter than the medical profession,” even as he admitted that some people who haven’t undergone training as required by rabbinical law will pose as mohels in order to make money, a practice which he strongly condemned. The Bloomberg administration strongly opposes the practice. “There are certain practices that doctors say are not safe and we will not permit those practices to the extent that we can stop them,” Bloomberg said. “You don’t have a right to put any child’s life in danger, and this clearly does.” |
|
Newborn dies after reportedly contracting herpes from controversial circumcision ritual by Wilder Fleming
NEW YORK CITY -- At a hearing yesterday in Queens, New York City rabbis defended a controversial circumcision practice that has been blamed for infecting infants with herpes, in some cases causing their death. The practice, called “metzitzah b’peh,” requires the circumciser, or mohel, to suck the infant’s wounds after circumcision, and has led to at least two cases of infant death in New York since 2000. The city wants to amend the health law to require mohels to obtain written consent from parents indicating they are fully aware of the risks involved in the ritual circumcision, or bris. “I myself have performed 25,000 circumcisions, and, thank God, we have not had one single incident … our guidelines are, I think, much stricter than the medical profession,” said Rabbi A. Romi Cohn, a mohel and a Holocaust survivor who represented the American Board of Ritual Circumcision at the hearing. But Cohn admitted that some people who are not certified according to Jewish law masquerade as mohels in order to make money, sometimes as much as $500 to $1,000 per bris. “This is completely forbidden, but unfortunately they are doing it,” Cohn said. “These people don’t know what sterility means. They don’t know about infection. We try to tell parents that if they choose a circumciser, he should be board-certified.” Mohels argued the city’s proposed changes would infringe on their religious freedom, but city health officials are pushing back. “The concept of informed consent puts more of the decision-making power and more of the information in the hands of the parents,” said Susan Blank, the assistant commissioner of the STD Control Program at the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Blank said she was confused by rabbis’ opposition, which she argued allowed them their religious freedom while simultaneously allowing parents greater control over their child’s welfare. “The Department has received multiple complaints from parents whose children may not have been infected who were also not aware that direct oral suction was going to be performed as part of their sons’ circumcisions,” according to a notice from the New York City Board of Health. The city’s interference in the ritual could lead to legal action, the mohels said. “Being a mohel is a religious status…I cannot follow an outside authority,” said Rabbi Levi Heber, the director of the International Bris Association. Heber said that if the city enacted the proposed amendment the mohels would take legal action to stop it. “If we feel that our religious freedom is being restricted, we have the right to challenge it in court … we are ready, if needed, to challenge this,” he said. The Board of Health plans to reach a decision on the proposal in September. |
|
Baby’s Death Renews Debate Over a Circumcision Ritual By LIZ ROBBINS
Prosecutors are investigating the death of a newborn boy who died in September after contracting herpes through a controversial practice of ritual circumcision, reviving a debate in New York over safety and religious freedom. The Brooklyn district attorney, Charles J. Hynes, confirmed on Wednesday that the investigation was continuing, but declined to comment further. The cause of death of the 2-week-old boy, who died at Maimonides Hospital in Brooklyn on Sept. 28, was Type 1 herpes, caused by “ritual circumcision with oral suction,” according to the medical examiner’s office. The ritual of oral suction — or in Hebrew, metzitzah b’peh — is practiced almost exclusively in ultra-Orthodox communities and, to a lesser degree, in Orthodox Jewish communities, despite efforts by the city to curtail it and educate communities about its health risks. The procedure occurs during the circumcision ritual of the bris, as the practitioner, or mohel, removes the foreskin of the penis and then sucks the blood from the wound to clean it. In 2003 and 2004, the city reported three cases of Type 1 herpes that were linked to circumcision, involving a boy on Staten Island and twin boys in Brooklyn, one of whom died. The procedures were done by one mohel, Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, who was later prohibited from performing the ritual in New York City. The authorities have not determined the identity of the mohel in the most recent case, but since the death they have been trying to work with the Hasidic community. In 2004, after the death of the twin, the Brooklyn district attorney tried to investigate but received little cooperation within the community, according to a person with knowledge of the case who spoke on the condition of anonymity because it was not brought to trial. It was not believed that Rabbi Fischer was under investigation for the latest case, and he did not return a phone call seeking comment. His lawyer from the 2004 investigation, Mark J. Kurzmann, said he would not comment. Roughly two-thirds of newborn boys in the city’s Orthodox communities are circumcised with metzitzah b’peh, said Rabbi David Zwiebel, the executive vice president of Agudath Israel of America, who said he was using a calculation based on religious school enrollment figures. He said that the mohels in the Hasidic community were cognizant of hygiene and that there were things they could do to reduce the risk of herpes without ending the practice. “We’re not oblivious to what’s going on,” Rabbi Zwiebel said. “The worst thing that could happen is if the authorities regulate this practice, then it could go underground,” he said. “I think the practice would continue, but there could be significant difficulty in gathering evidence. I would hope that our government officials take steps in conjunction with the community.” In 2005, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg assembled rabbis throughout the city to try to persuade them to move away from metzitzah b’peh. But they said that the practice was safe and that there was no definitive evidence that it caused herpes. “The Orthodox Jewish community will continue the practice that has been practiced for over 5,000 years,” Rabbi David Niederman of the United Jewish Organization in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, said at the time. “‘We do not change. And we will not change.” But in the Bronx on Tuesday, the mayor talked about the medical examiner’s findings in the most recent death, which was also investigated by the health department. “There is probably nobody in public life who fights harder for the separation of church and state than I do, but I just wanted to remind everybody: religious liberty does not simply extend to injuring others or putting children at risk,” Mr. Bloomberg said. “And we will continue working with the community and others to prevent more baby boys from suffering these tragic fates.” Neonatal Herpes Cases From ‘Metzitzah’ In ’09 Now Confirmed In Rockland By Hella Winston Two Rockland County infants who had undergone the controversial circumcision rite of metzitzah b’peh were treated for neonatal herpes there in 2009, The Jewish Week has learned. According to the Rockland County health commissioner, Dr. Joan Facelle, in neither case was the health department able to make a link to a particular mohel because the mohel’s identity could not be confirmed. Both of the infants were treated and survived. New York City authorities currently investigating the September herpes-related death of an infant who underwent metzitzah b’peh, or oral suction, have also been unable to confirm the identity the mohel. According to a source with knowledge of the investigation, the family has “closed ranks” around the mohel and members of the community are saying that the baby died “because of the mother not caring for him properly.” The Jewish Week was privy to one recent conversation between a mohel and a community member in which this same allegation was also made by the mohel. The Rockland County cases have raised a red flag because Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, a mohel who has already been linked to four neonatal herpes infections (including one death) and has been under an order banning him from performing the ritual in New York state since 2007, lives in Rockland County. While, according to Facelle, Rabbi Fischer was “certainly … well aware” of the order at the time, The Jewish Week learned that Fischer is still scheduling brises with metzitzah b’peh in Rockland County, though it has not been established that he was involved in the 2009 cases. Meanwhile, the Forward has reported that two Jewish infants in New Jersey were also treated “within the last year or two” for neonatal herpes after undergoing metzitzah b’peh, according to Dr. Margaret Fisher, chair of pediatrics at Monmouth Medical Center. Unlike in New York state, which in early 2006 required that cases of herpes in infants aged 60 days or younger be reported to the health department, New Jersey does not list neonatal herpes among its list of communicable and reportable diseases. As such, it is impossible to know how many metzitzah b’peh-related cases may have occurred in the state, which is home to the large haredi community of Lakewood, among others. According to a 2009 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, untreated neonatal herpes simplex virus is associated with a 40 percent survival rate, and even with the early initiation of high-dose intravenous acyclovir therapy, it can result in “considerable disability among survivors.” The neonatal herpes virus can spread to the brain and central nervous system causing encephalitis and meningitis and leading to mental retardation, cerebral palsy. Herpes can also spread to internal organs, such as the liver and lungs. NY Officials Bar Rabbi from Circumcision Ritual Wed Feb 2, 2005 NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York City health officials have gone to court to stop a rabbi from performing a type of ritual circumcision they believe may have led to the death of a baby boy from herpes. The baby was one of three infants found to have contracted herpes simplex virus after being circumcised by Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, who used his mouth to draw blood from the infant's wound, a traditional Orthodox practice during the bris, or religious circumcision. The complaint filed by the department of health in Manhattan Supreme Court asked that Fischer submit blood samples to be tested for the herpes virus and no longer engage in the specific practice until an investigation was completed. The court papers, filed on Dec. 22, were reported on by the Daily News on Wednesday "Rabbi Fischer is still performing circumcisions, but he is complying with the court's direction," his lawyer, Mark J. Kurzmann, told Reuters on Wednesday. Kurzmann described Fischer as a London-trained, "internationally known" mohel, or someone who performs circumcisions. Ten days after Fischer circumcised twins last October, one died of herpes and the other tested positive for the virus, according to the court papers. A third baby circumcised by Fisher was later found to have also tested positive for herpes, health officials said. An affidavit submitted to the court by Dr. Susan Blank, assistant commissioner of the health department, said Fischer had performed about 350 Jewish circumcisions in the area. Blank noted that the herpes virus, which is common in adults and often causes lesions known as "fever blisters" or "cold sores" is easily transmitted but not usually a serious illness in adults. In newborn infants, however, herpes can cause severe illness and may be fatal, she said. Kurzmann suggested the infants could have contracted the infection some other way. "Rabbi Fischer is cooperating fully with the city's investigation in order to determine the true sources of the infection," Kurzmann said. |
|
By STEVE LIEBERMAN A lawyer for the Monsey Hasidic rabbi suspected of transmitting a fatal case of herpes to a baby boy during a circumcision said yesterday that the practice of suctioning blood orally is thousands of years old and integral to the religion. But one local scholar said such unsanitized rituals actually violated Jewish law. Another rabbi saw the case as outsiders frowning on Hasidic traditions. Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer is being investigated by New York City health officials after a baby died of herpes, and two others contracted the disease. Fischer, a mohel in Rockland, the metropolitan area and Israel, uses his mouth to suck the blood from the wound caused by cutting the baby's foreskin. The centuries-old ritual, called "metzizah bi peh," is used predominantly by Hasidic Jews, who consider the practice mandatory for newborns. Most other Jewish mohels wear surgical gloves and use sterilized instruments. Many other mohels who do that part of the ritual use a medical tube to suction the blood, several rabbis said yesterday. Ritual circumcision, or bris, dates to the prophet Abraham and is said to symbolize God's covenant with the Jewish people. Fischer is not accused of violating any criminal laws. The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene took civil action under its legal powers to protect the health and safety of the children and investigate outbreaks of communicable diseases. After a child died of herpes and two others were infected, the city's health commissioner ordered Fischer to undergo blood tests for herpes and stop using the mouth suction method without a tube until the issue was resolved. He continued to use the mouth suction method, so court orders were sought in December, the city's lawyers wrote in court papers. Fischer's lawyer, Mark J. Kurzmann, said yesterday that the rabbi was cooperating with the city's investigation. Kurzmann, whose son, Hillel, also is working on the case, declined to say whether the rabbi would submit to a blood test, citing medical privacy reasons. "The source of the children's herpes has not been confirmed, and it may have been an unfortunate coincidence," Kurzmann said. "This is an integral part of the religious practice for thousands of years," Kurzmann said. "There have been hundreds of thousands of babies who have undergone this ritual, and the incidence of herpes is virtually nil." Fischer, 66, could not be reached for comment at his home. Kurzmann said he would speak for the rabbi, who was trained in circumcisions by the British Milah Society. The city health department took action after being notified in November that a newborn less than three weeks old had died Oct. 26 of herpes simplex virus type 1. The infant's twin brother tested positive for the infection. Fischer performed the double bris on Oct. 16, the city's court papers state. City health department officials later learned that a Staten Island baby also tested positive for herpes after being circumcised by the rabbi in late 2003, according to the court papers. Herpes is far more dangerous to infants than adults because of their fragile immune systems. An outbreak of a disease is defined in the city's health code as one that has been reported in three or more instances. "The New York City Department Health and Mental Hygiene is concerned that the possible transmission of herpes simplex in infants is continuing as a result of the ... practice of Metzizah bi peh," city lawyers wrote in court papers dated Dec. 22. The mouth-suction ritual during a circumcision is not mandated by Jewish law, said Rabbi Moses Tendler, a professor of ethical medical practices and Talmudic law at Yeshiva University. Tendler, the rabbi of Community Synagogue of Monsey, also serves on the Rabbinical Council of America, an Orthodox Jewish group. Tendler said the unsanitized ritual performed by Fischer violated Jewish law. Tendler said the Talmud refers to sucking the blood from the wound, but doesn't specifically indicate using one's mouth. "I protested his use of oral suction as violating good medical practices, which he is required to do under Jewish law," Tendler said. "Jewish law has recognized there has been an increase in knowledge of hygiene and medical advances over the centuries. It is not a lack of respect for the traditions or Jewish law to use a tube." Monsey Rabbi David Eidensohn, 62, said the spreading of disease is rare through the oral suction method. He said his five sons and numerous grandsons, as well as hundreds of thousands of newborn boys, had undergone the procedure. Fischer, he said, is a respected mohel across the region and in Israel. "This represents people frowning on our traditions," Eidensohn said. "If this happened regularly or even occasionally, we would be the first to stop the practice ourselves. We don't want to kill our children. This is a tragedy for the families." Stanley J. Kogan, chief of pediatric urology at Children's Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, has been performing in-hospital circumcisions for three decades. "In my 30 years of doing circumcisions, I have never had a patient develop an infection with genital herpes afterward," said Kogan, who has a private practice in White Plains and is on staff at Nyack Hospital. "That speaks to just how unusual it is." Physicians performing circumcisions are careful to clean the patient's skin before the incision is made. All instruments are sterile, and special care is taken to make sure that the tissue is treated gently to prevent trauma, he said. But occasionally, babies develop complications from circumcision, he said. "Even in the cleanest operating room under the best circumstances, you can get an infection," Kogan said. "There is never no risk with any surgical procedure."
Circumcision rite is risky, city says BY MAGGIE HABERMAN A form of religious circumcision holds "inherent risks" for babies, the city health commissioner said yesterday. Dr. Thomas Frieden's comments came the day the Daily News reported that his agency is investigating whether an infant who died of herpes last year contracted the disease from the rabbi who circumcised him. Two more city babies were found to have contracted herpes after they were circumcised by the same rabbi, Rockland County-based Yitzchok Fischer. Fischer practices a ritual used mostly among ultra-Orthodox Jews called metzizah bi peh, in which the person performing the circumcision draws blood from the wound using his mouth. "We do believe that there are inherent risks to this practice and we're discussing those in a respectful" way with ultra-Orthodox leaders, Frieden said. In November and again in December, the city ordered Fischer, a prominent mohel who claims to have performed more than 12,000 circumcisions, to submit to a blood test to determine whether he has herpes simplex 1 virus. Neither Frieden nor Fischer's lawyer would say yesterday whether the test had been done. The issue of metzizah bi peh has been debated in recent years within the Jewish community. Some, like Yeshiva University Prof. Rabbi Moshe Tendler, argue it's not required and too risky. But Frieden's comments touched off concern among other Jewish leaders, who said they were leery of government intervention in religious custom. Chana Ausband, a Rockland County mother, said Fischer performed her baby's circumcision. "What he's doing is following tradition. For years and years, that has not caused any problems," Ausband said. Originally published on February 3, 2005 Rockland to review rabbi's circumcisions By STEVE LIEBERMAN Rockland health officials will review circumcisions performed by a Monsey rabbi suspected of transmitting herpes to three New York City newborns while orally suctioning blood during the religious ritual. One baby died from the disease in New York City while two others tested positive for herpes. Rockland Health Department officials said yesterday that they were monitoring New York City's investigation, but plan to independently review Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer's circumcisions in the county. The city wants the rabbi to take a blood test to determine if he has herpes. Rockland Health Department Public Health Administrator Kathleen Henry said the county agency would stay in contact with New York City and evaluate the results of the city's review of the rabbi. Health Commissioner Joan Facelle said she has the legal power to protect the health and safety of county residents. Assistant County Attorney Thomas Walsh, who is assigned to the Health Department, said he didn't think the county would wait long for New York City to make a determination concerning the rabbi. "We're going to gather facts about Rockland," Walsh said. "Our No. 1 goal is to protect the health and safety of our residents." New York City officials filed court papers to prohibit Fischer from conducting the circumcisions. Fischer's techniques are not illegal. The city has taken civil action to protect the health of newborns. While the city would not comment on whether Fischer would take the blood test, the rabbi's lawyer, Mark J. Kurzmann, said he was cooperating with the city. Kurzmann declined to comment on whether cooperation meant taking the blood tests. Fischer, a mohel in Rockland, the metropolitan area and Israel, uses his mouth to suck the blood from the wound caused by cutting the baby's foreskin. The centuries-old ritual, called "metzizah bi peh," is used predominantly on Hasidic Jews, who consider the practice mandatory for newborns. Ritual circumcision, or bris, dates to the prophet Abraham and is said to symbolize God's covenant with the Jewish people. Most other Jewish mohels wear surgical gloves and use sterilized instruments. Many other mohels who do that part of the ritual use a medical tube to suction the blood, several rabbis said. Rockland health officials don't know how many circumcisions Fischer has done in the county. But several rabbis said Fischer had been performing circumcisions for several decades. Send e-mail to Steve Lieberman Hasidic circumcision rite debated By GARY STERN The suctioning of blood by mouth during ritual circumcisions has long been dropped as a common practice by most of the Jewish world, but many Jews and non-Jews alike were shocked to learn in recent days that the practice remains standard in many Hasidic communities. The largely unknown practice, which has been used during the Jewish circumcision ritual for thousands of years, came to public attention last week when New York City health officials said that a Hasidic rabbi and mohel from Monsey was suspected of transmitting the herpes virus to three New York City infants he had circumcised. One of the infants died in October. Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, a prominent Hasidic mohel, suctions blood orally during the circumcision ritual, known as a bris, in order to remove impurities. He is suspected of passing the oral herpes virus, which generally produces cold sores but can be passed to another person's genital area. Rockland County health officials said they would do their own investigation. "It is very, very rare for the mohel to suck out the blood himself," said Rabbi Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice president of the Orthodox Union, which represents Orthodox congregations in North America. "The mohalim I speak to in our community say they use latex gloves and a glass tube for suction, and they take every precaution so they do not come into contact with the baby's blood and the baby does not come into contact with their blood," Weinreb said. "This is for the protection of the baby and, frankly, for the protection of the mohel, because one never knows what the baby might be carrying from the parent." This past August, the journal Pediatrics published a study that concluded that the oral suctioning of blood during a ritual Jewish circumcision, a practice called "metzitzah," puts infants at risk of contracting herpes and should be eliminated. The study looked at eight cases of infants who contracted herpes after oral suctioning during a bris. Twelve researchers, including seven from Israel, also considered the religious and cultural traditions behind the practice. They noted that the Babylonian Talmud, completed in the fifth century, required oral suctioning in order to remove health risks to the infant. But later rabbinical authorities, the study found, modified their approach as they developed new understandings of hygiene and disease transmission. "The same consideration that led the Talmudic sages once to establish the custom of the metzitzah for the sake of the infant could now be applied to persuade the mohel to use instrumental suction," the study concluded. One of the researchers involved in the study was Rabbi Moses Tendler of Monsey, a professor of ethical medical practices and Talmudic law at Yeshiva University, often called the flagship of modern Orthodoxy. Tendler last week said the Talmud requires that blood be sucked from the wound during circumcision, but not that it be done by mouth. Rabbi Gerald Chirnomas from Boonton, N.J., a prominent mohel in the Greater New York region, said the practice of orally suctioning blood was the norm for centuries. "When a person cuts a finger, what's the first thing they would do?" he said. "Suck out the blood so any possible contamination is sucked out. The rabbi applied the same thinking to this practice." Health concerns about the practice are known to have come up from time to time, Chirnomas said. During the mid-19th century, for instance, the Polish government forbade the practice when a popular mohel had a tooth abscess and an infant died. By the time Chirnomas, a Conservative rabbi, was trained as a mohel decades ago by two Orthodox mohalim in Jerusalem, the practice of oral suctioning had been largely replaced by the use of a glass tube to suck away the blood. These days, Chirnomas, who has performed some 14,000 ritual circumcisions, uses a gauze pad to soak up the blood. "Using the mouth was done for thousands of years," he said. "But it is important that people realize that within the general Jewish community, this practice is not followed. Within the very Orthodox community, the Hasidic community, they do not accept this change. Traditions die hard." Rabbi Avi Shafran, director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America, an advocacy group for Orthodox Judaism, said that while the practice of suctioning blood by mouth is rare, Hasidic communities that believe it is important are unlikely to give it up. "In most communities, it is not done this way, but in many it is a religious tradition of many generations," he said. "I understand that what may have happened in this case is exceedingly rare. Pediatricians in communities where this is done as a matter of course have told us that they have never seen a case like this, ever. Jews have been circumcising their sons for quite a while, and this is getting attention because it is so unusual." Two of the infants who contracted herpes after being circumcised by Fischer, including the one who died, were twins. The double bris was performed on Oct. 16. New York City health officials later discovered that another boy tested positive for herpes after being circumcised by Fischer in 2003, according to court papers. Fischer is not accused of any crimes, but in a day when there is great concern about sexual molestation of children, many may wonder how an adult can legally put his mouth on a child's genitals. Vincent Bonventre, a law professor at Albany Law School, said that courts often allow exemptions to general laws for religious practices. "Cases are more difficult when there is a direct conflict between law and religion, like when a religion requires an act that is forbidden by law," Bonventre said. "When the government's interest is not paramount, the courts generally hold that you can't require an individual to violate their religion."
After infant's death from herpes, scrutiny turns to circumcision rite By JTA The death of one infant boy from herpes and the infection of two others has focused attention on an ancient practice that is still used in some fervently Orthodox communities as they circumcise babies. New York City health officials are investigating whether the mohel who operated on the three boys had infected them. The city's legal department has been granted a temporary restraining order against Rabbi Yitzhak Fischer until the investigation is complete. Fischer practices a custom called metzitzah b'peh - loosely translated as oral suction - that is considered an integral part of the brit milah in parts of the Jewish world, though it is met with shock and distaste in others. It's not known if Fischer carries the herpes virus, but the restraining order forbids him from practicing metzitzah b'peh, and demands that he wear surgical gloves when he performs a circumcision. The Talmud describes the process of removing the baby boy's foreskin in three steps: The foreskin is cut, the mucous layer underneath is removed with a flick of the mohel's fingernail and then the blood is removed through oral suction. Often the first two steps are combined, and the fingernail motion is abandoned in favor of a surgical clamp. In the third step, the mohel traditionally takes a sip of wine in his mouth, quickly sucks the blood off through the wine and spits the mixture into a bowl to be discarded. That is metzitzah b'peh. In some parts of the Orthodox world - mainly but not exclusively among Chasidim - metzitzah b'peh is still practiced. Among other Orthodox Jews, however, metzitzah b'peh is considered unacceptable, and among more liberal Jews it's unthinkable. Fischer can do the brit either way, said his lawyer, Mark Kurzmann. He can use his mouth directly or he can suck the blood through a thin glass pipette. "It depends on the preference of the parents, and that depends on their particular religious community," Kurtzmann said. He added that "tens of thousands" of circumcisions using metzitzah b'peh have been done in the last seven years, with very few adverse results. Not true, concluded researchers writing in the August 2004 issue of the medical journal Pediatrics. "Ritual Jewish circumcision that includes metzitzah with direct oral-genital contact carries a serious risk for transmission of HSV" - herpes simplex virus - "from mohels to neonates," the article said. "Oral metzitzah after ritual circumcision may be hazardous to the neonate." Signed by 12 medical doctors and Ph.D. researchers, the paper examined the cases of eight young babies who had developed herpes within two weeks of their circumcisions. The only disease vector shared by all the babies was the mohelim, all of whom tested positive for the herpes virus and all of whom had performed metzitzah b'peh. One of the researchers was Rabbi Moses Tendler, who holds a doctorate in biology and teaches biology at Yeshiva University, teaches rabbinical students at Y.U.'s seminary, specializes in Jewish medical ethics and also is a pulpit rabbi. Tendler minced no words when discussing metzitzah b'peh. "What people don't understand is how widely disseminated the herpes virus is. Statistics say that 80 percent of the adult American population carries it, as you well know from how many people in their lives acquire a cold sore," he said. "It's an omnipresent danger, and for an infant, in the early days before his immune system kicks in, it's not necessarily localized. It can be a systemic infection. "I'm particularly disturbed that once this information becomes available, the mohelim don't do what they're told," Tendler continued. "When the AIDS epidemic started, the great rabbinic scholars of their day concluded that the mohelim should use a sterilized glass tube so they could avoid catching AIDS from the baby. It never occurred to them to think that the baby could catch something from them." Rabbi Daniel Korobkin, rabbi of Kehillat Yavneh in Los Angeles, is Orthodox and a mohel. "I will perform a routine brit only with completely antiseptic material, making sure that I never come in direct contact with a child's blood," he said. "The only exception was my own children. If a parent asks me to do it, I refuse," he continued. "I do give the father the option of doing it himself, though. Most are too squeamish, but a few want to do it." Korobkin trained as a mohel in 1990 in Jerusalem; by then, he said, the dictate to avoid metzitzah b'peh had been in place for some time. In fact, he added, the precedent for avoiding direct contact with the baby's blood can be traced to an outbreak of disease in the early 19th century; until then the practice was widespread. Then the great sage known as Chatam Sofer decreed that such contact could expose the child to danger. The Shulchan Aruch - the authoritative medieval compendium of Jewish law - "takes great pains to instruct every mohel to make sure that his utmost priority is the safety and welfare of the child," said Rabbi Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice president of the Orthodox Union. "I think it's fair to say that there are a substantial number of Orthodox rabbis who find nothing objectionable whatsoever" in using a pipette, Weinreb said. As an umbrella organization, the Orthodox Union doesn't have an official policy on ritual or religious matters. If pressed for a personal recommendation on which method to use, however, Weinreb said that for safety's sake he would suggest following Korobkin's lead. Rabbi David Zweibel, executive vice president for public affairs at Agudath Israel of America, a fervently Orthodox umbrella group, said his organization is dedicated to supporting the range of religious expression found among its constituent groups. Orthodox Jews whose traditions come from the German community never use metzitzah b'peh, he said, but it's common in many of the Brooklyn-based Chasidic communities that trace their roots to eastern Europe. He added that it hasn't been proven that the babies had contracted herpes from Fischer, suggesting that other means of transmission were possible. The question of whether metzitzah b'peh should be done depends on whether that stage of the brit is considered an integral part of the procedure or simply medical aftercare, Zweibel said. Communities that consider it integral often consider themselves bound to use traditional methods, such as metzitzah b'peh, he said, while those that do not consider it integral are free - in fact, obligated - to use modern, sanitary methods instead. Tendler said that in his Monsey, N.Y. community the practice of metzitzah b'peh is spreading, as is cutting the foreskin and removing the mucous layer in two discreet actions. The use of the surgical clamp is coming under fire as well, he said. There is a religious requirement to perform a brit milah painlessly, which means as quickly and as antiseptically as possible, Tendler said. "This is a requirement of Jewish law, not of medicine only," he said. "Metzitzah is strictly medieval medicine, and it should have given way to modern medicine. "We have a tradition that says that when it comes to medicine, you don't look into the Talmud. You seek the most competent physician to tell you what to do." |
|
NY Rabbi Nochum Rosenberg attacked by pedophile rabbis in London Global "Anti-Semitism" Review Act of 2004 ignores definition of "Semite" Dr Texe Marrs PhD reads Pirate News and reports on pedophile rabbis Jewish illegal aliens from Communist Russia get $60,000/year Social Security in USA
|
|
|
|
fellatio. "Sarah Bunin Benor, assistant professor of contemporary Jewish studies at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, argued that 'Jewish English' is a Jewish language similar to Yiddish and Ladino.' This new language, she said, had been created by the most Jewishly educated portion of the Jewish community, having incorporated hundreds of Yiddish and Hebrew words into everyday conversation. Like Glinert, Bunin Benor cited traditional Jewish speech patterns, such as 'asking a question and then answering it.' And she noted that Jewish English even includes the traditional 'secretive, humorous and offensive ways of talking about non-Jews.'" "The New Testament is a lying, hateful, harmful book, ultimately responsible for the deaths of six million Jews in World War II." "Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, especially the New Testament." Rabbi Injuncted for Cannibalistic Orgy of Death-by-Circumcision TO: Dr. Stan Monteith, MD by John Lee |
Enclosed is the published mainline news item I quoted during my phone call to your radio show today, before I was cut off and censored, when you claimed you did not beleive this fact of Jewish Talmudic law, nor this trial on the NY civil court docket. Presumeably, as a surgeon, you of all people should appreciate the health risks imposed upon everyone when rabbis are allowed to practice surgery with their bloody incisors. What would you say if a heart surgeon - for example Dr Bill Frist, speaker of the US Senate - performed a heart transplant and LICKED THE BLOOD from the open chest wound! Would that be "newsworthy"? It's not "newsworthy" to the Jewish media cartel that goulish heart surgeons are mere cannibals, tearing the beating hearts out of LIVING people, to MURDER them, then ripping the hearts out of more living people, just so they can play Dr. Jekyl and Jewish Dr. Frankenstein, for a $1-million payday, like a modern-day Aztec cannibal priest. It's not "newsworthy" to the Jewish media cartel that Dr. Frist, owner of Hospital Corporation of America, paid a $840-MILLION criminal fine for Medicare/Medicaid FRAUD by stealing from the government and the taxpayers. In honor of his crime amoung master-thieves, Dr. Frist was then selected into the US Senate, and was promoted to Speaker of the Senate in his FIRST term as a Freshman senator, while his executives rotted in prison. How's that for Gangster Government?! As I said on your radio show, the "Jewish-owned media cartel" loves to talk about corruption in the Christian religion, such as gay Jim Bakker's prison term for theft of $100-million, or billionaire Paul Crouch's extortion bribe of $400,000+ to his gay lover, or the Catholic pedophiles. (As an example of the "Jewish media cartel": Fox News is owned by Aussie Jewish porno king Rupert Murdock with his Commie Chinese wife.) But this Jewish cartel NEVER a mentions the orthodox Jewish tradition of circumcision, which requires rabbis to literally "suck dick" of little babies, for which a rabbi was "sued for murder" in New York in 2005 (mainline news articles included below). I wonder why the Jew-dicial System has thus far refused to arrest or indict this serial-killing rabbi? Where are the criminal prosecutors and grand juries? What about citizen's arrest by the victim's family, or are they mind-kontrolled, too? I wonder why the Jewish-dominated "news" media has refused to broadcast this carriage of injustice? Compare the media's silence with that of the American school girl presumed murdered in the nation of Aruba, with Jewish journalists like Geraldo Rivera tripping over themselves for a multi-month vacation to the Carribbean. In US military, "sucking dick" is a "homosexual crime" punishable by courts martial, and it is still a felony in many states. That makes rabbis homosexuals and criminal pedophiles, doesn't it? Don't forget vampirism and cannibalism. The Jewish cartel loves to blame faggots and drug addicts with spreading AIDS and other (bioweaponized) diseases, but never mentions diseases spread by pedophile-cannibal rabbis. Oh yeah, rabbis are also guilty of practicing medicine without a medical-doctor license. Or does The Law not apply to Jews? To say that this Jewish custom is disgusting, as well as a grave danger to ALL society, is an understatement of Biblical proportions. Isn't that newsworthy, if only for the public-health consequences? The Jewish media cartel does an outrageous job censoring thedefinition of what a "Jewish" Semite REALLY is. EVERY dictionary defines the word "Semite" as an ARAB or a CHRISTIAN who "speaks a Semitic language", but NOT a "Jew" living in USA or Europe who fails to speak a Semitic language. Thus the Iraqi Wars, perped by the Bush Gang (and their partner the Jewish Clinton-Blythe-Rockefeller Gang), AND the war-mongering media, are by definition "Anti-Semitic", making Bush et al. guilty of "hate crimes".
90% of so-called "Jews" have zero DNA from ancient Israel, since they are Khazar AshkeNAZI "Jews" from East Germany, Russia and Turkey, and have no more right to claim modern "Israel" in Palestine than I do in Tennessee, USA. "NAZI" literally is defined as "wandering Jew" (DOH!). Most "Jews" instinctively hate their own "religion", which is a Satanic branch of Babylonean Talmudism and Cabalistic witchcraft, with no link to the Biblical Old Testament Scriptures. Thus atheistic Communism is almost a step up for "Jews", as a new religion for worshipping Big Brother's Police-State Gulag Death-Camp plantation, that currently genocides 2.5-million amerikans every year, with de facto (illegal) immunity from arrest and prosecution. Lest we forget, Jew Karl Marx invented atheistic Communism, while living in the Jewish banking district on London, England. Jewish Communism genocided 100-million of its own citizens, DURING PEACETIME, plus over 60-million genocided during world wars triggered by Jewish banksters to enslave entire nations with eternal debt. Lest we forget, Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler Shicklegruber was illegitimate heir to half the world's wealth via the Jewish Rothschild bankster dynasty, and he employed 150,000 Jews in the Gestapo and military DURING World War 2, including his top Nazis, like Hermann Goering and Gestapo chief Heinrich Himmler, who was in charge of the Final Solution's Death Camps. Hitler's war was essential for the Jewish banksters to invent its United Nations corporation and the Communist State of Israel Municipal Corporation. Note that UN Corporation is merely a branch of the Jewish-owned British Empire, that out-votes the USA by 55 votes to one vote, thanks to the 55 nations in the "former" British Commonwealth. Oh yeah, Jewish rabbis murdered Jewish rabbi Jesus Christ Yahweh, and his disciples, for daring to expose the fraud that is Babylonean Talmudic witchcraft, that has replaced the original Jewish religion. Modern Jews don't even speak ancient Hebrew, but have replaced it with modern Yiddish. Note that Luciferian Freemasonry, which you rightly expose its Satan-worship that Pike confessed in his Morals and Dogma. Masonry is basically Jewish infiltration of the Christian church, to make Jewish banking/loansharking/extortion rackets "acceptable" by the gullible Goyim, in violation of Christian law. General Albert Pike, the Masonic Pope, was a genocidal Jew who was convicted of treason during the US Civil War, for being an agent of the British government, seeking to slip USA into two weaker nations indebted the the international banksters. My cousins are Jews, including one Jewish cousin who was invited as a guest to Bohemian Grove. The wealthiest members of my family are in the "Masonic Mafia" (Jewish banking/insurance/judicial rackets). I was baptised in a Baptist church, where my relatives have Masonic funerals. I'm not happy that Jews are running my society, my country and my family into Hell. According to its own website (ADL.ORG), the Jewish Luciferian Masonic "Anti-Defamation League Corporation" was chartered in 1913, the same year as the Federal Reserve Act (to turn over all US money to international Jewish counterfeiters at Federal Reserve Bank Corporation), and the same year as the UNratified 16th Amendment for the VOLUNTARY federal income tax. This is NOT a coincidence. The ADL is merely an intelligence branch of what is now Israeli Mossad, which itself is a subdivision of Brtish MI-6. ADL is anti-American, and its members were convicted of treasonous spying and terrorism in USA. That's why Gangster Government lets ADL Inc. write all its "hate-crime" laws in USA, to criminalize Christianity. As a Masonic member of my family told me, "So what? What the Hell are YOU going to do about all THIS?" He is a member of Scarabbean Senior Secret Society, equivalent to Yale's Skull & Bones Senior Secret Society. I have reason to suspect he has attended Bohemian Grove as a guest. One of my Jewish cousins did attend Bohemian Grove as a guest. Bohemian Grove is described as a homosexual nudist colony for elitist Jews. I'm going to raise what police call a "hue and cry", to alert the sheeple that the wolves are HERE, NOW, WITH BLOOD ON THEIR LIPS. PirateNews.org is an equal-opportunity whistleblower. |
|
|
as Knesset repeals immunity law for Knesset members Will PM Sharon be arrested next in a Silent Coup? AshkeNAZI Chief Rabbi Yona Meztger that called for the prime minister’s demise 10 years after they had put the same curse on slain Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. 'It was a call for the angels of destruction to kill Arik Sharon'. The Kabbalistic ceremony was authorized by rabbis." YnetNews.com, 26 July 2005 "So what? Bush, Blair and Sharon could all be killed tomorrow Attorney General Mazuz announces Tuesday that Knesset Member Omri Sharon, Ariel Sharon’s son, will be charged with serious offences in connection with illegal political fundraising, after efforts to arrange plea bargain fail By Ynetnews.com TEL AVIV, Israel – A serious indictment against the prime minister’s son: Attorney General Menachem Mazuz announced Tuesday he has decided to indict Omri Sharon on serious offences in connection with apparent illegal political fundraising. The indictment follows failed efforts to arrange a plea bargain over the affair. Justice Ministry officials say negotiations between the sides failed to reach an agreement as a result of Mazuz’s insistence to include serious, penal code offences in the indictment. The charges faced by Sharon junior include breach of trust and false testimony and go back to offences apparently committed during Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s Likud primaries campaign in 1999. Despite the fact that a plea bargain deal has not been reached, it is expected that the two sides will get an agreement. However, for now, it seems that Omri Sharon will be tried for serious crimes. The Attorney General's Office has been waiting for Tuesday night's passing of a law that removes automatic immunity from Knesset members. Now, the attorney general can indict a legislator without first having to go before a Knesset committee. The indictment was issued after Mazuz conducted a hearing with Sharon. Ready to face trial In a letter sent to Knesset chairman Reuven Rivilin and Knesset committee chairman Ronny Bar-On, Omri Sharon said that he is giving up his immunity. The letter also laid out the chain of events in question and contained an admission by Sharon that he had violated the Parties Law. Sharon criticized the restrictiveness of the law, saying that it was never put into practice and that "I am the one and only to be tried for violating it." Yet he added, "Yes, while working on my fathers' election campaign in 1999, I did not hold by the restrictions of the Parties Law, and I am ready to face justice. I will argue my case before the court that sits in judgment of me." The deal The investigations into the scandal began in 2001 after the police began to suspect that the prime minister and his son illegally raised millions of shekels in order finance a run in the Likud party primaries and, then afterwards, a run for prime minister. Attorney General Mazuz has recently been conducting meetings with Sharon's lawyer, Dan Scheinman, in order to reach a plea bargain agreement. The deal fell through when Sharon wanted a six-month sentence, served out as community service, and Mazuz insisted on nine months with some prison time. Sharon has now decided to take his chances with the courts. ‘We prayed for Sharon’s death’ Right-wing activists claim they had held a ‘Pulsa Dinura’ (curse) that called for the prime minister’s demise 10 years after they had put the same curse on slain Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin By Efrat Weiss ROSH PINA, Israel - Right-wing activists claim they performed a “Pulsa Dinura” - a kabbalistic ceremony in which God is asked to curse someone who is believed to be a sinner - calling for the death of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. Some 20 right-wing activists participated in the ceremony, which took place at the ancient cemetery in Rosh Pina. According to the participants, the ceremony was authorized by rabbis. “It was a call for the angels of destruction to kill Arik Sharon,” Michael Ben-Horin, who participated in the ceremony, told Ynet. “The ceremony was intended for the angels of destruction, not for humans, as it would be futile for people to attempt it (assassinating Sharon) amid all the prime minister’s security.” Hear excerpt from Pulsa Dinura ceremony Rabbi Yosef Dayan of the West Bank settlement of Psagot, who also participated in the ceremony, told Ynet: “About eight months ago, when Sharon’s (pullout) plan was gaining support, rabbis thought, for the first time, of performing a ‘Pulsa Dinura.’ I wasn’t in on it.” He said he told them at the time he would not perform any ceremony without a rabbinical order. “They approached a friend of mine, an attorney, who then came to me; three weeks ago, we organized a group of 35 people.” Dayan said, in the end, 20 people participated in the ceremony, adding that the rabbis ordered that those participating in the event must be married (no widowers or divorcees), over 40 years of age and bearded. “Everyone was dressed in black, except for one person who was dressed in white,” he said. “The ceremony took place in the ancient cemetery in Rosh Pina, near Shlomo Ben Yosef’s grave.” Dayan offered translated excerpts of the ceremony, which was conducted mostly in Aramaic: "We have permission to ask the higher beings to send angels of destruction to hurt Ariel Ben-Dvora Sheinerman (Ariel Sharon)." Attorney Baruch Ben-Yosef, who was also on hand for the ceremony, told Ynet: “We read the Pulsa Dinura prayer so the lord would take the murderous dictator who is murdering the people of Israel.” “We said the prayer near the grave of (hanged pre-state activist) Shlomo Ben-Yosef - the most suitable site - as he is Sharon’s antithesis,” he said. “Ben-Yosef sacrificed his soul for the people of Israel, while Sharon is robbing the nation. We hope the lord will take him from us.” Ben-Yosef added, “We hope the lord hears us and saves the people of Israel the bloody civil war Sharon is bringing upon us.” The rabbi said questions were raised regarding Sharon’s religion some two hours prior to the ceremony, as the ceremony may be conducted only against people who are Jewish according to halacha (traditional Jewish law). “The kabbalist rabbis told us not to do it, but eventually we decided to perform the ceremony, as in any case Sharon is considered by the public to be Jewish,” he said. Mofaz also targeted Ben-Horin said the call was for angels of destruction to kill Sharon. "Hitler and Stalin combined were guarded by 10 percent of the security force that protects Sharon, so it would be futile to have mortals attempt it (assassination)," he said. “God can kill in many different ways, and we pray that just as he took Uzi Chitman (singer) and Ehud Manor (songwriter), so, too, would he take Sharon within a month’s time.” A few months ago unidentified right-wing activists sent Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz a letter in which they threatened to perform a “Pulsa Dinura” ceremony against him. Earlier in the week a rumor was spread among far-right activists that Sharon had suffered a heart attack during a cabinet meeting. Sharon, in turn, interrupted the meeting to refute the rumor. “A few minutes ago I heard a rumor that I had suffered a heart attack, but I would like to reassure, or disappoint, all of you; as you can see I am healthy,” the prime minister said in jest. Condemnations of the Pulsa Dinura death prayer against Prime Minister Sharon, conducted by radical rabbis and right-wing activists, have come flooding in from across the political spectrum Efrat Weiss and Diana Bahur-Nir The incitement against Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has reached alarming new levels on Tuesday, following claims by radical right-wing activsts that a Pulsa Dinura (death curse) was placed on Sharon, and that rabbis have prayed for his demise. The events were widely condemned by politicians across the political spectrum. “This phenomenon not only crosses all the red lines, but also violates what is permissible in a democratic country,” said Knesset Member Ehud Yatom, a Likud rebel who is opposed to the disengagement. “I expect the police to investigate these rabbis and whoever else was responsible for this, to try them, and to imprison them. The fact that the prime minister’s life was threatened like this is unacceptable, irrespective of where one stands on the pullout,” he added. However, Yatom’s condemnations did not satisfy the chairman of Peace Now, Yariv Openheimer, who called on the whole of the right-wing camp to “do some urgent soul-searching before the next political murder takes place, and not to wait for the day after it happens.” “We’re not talking about a few bad apples, but an entire field of extremists who are willing to kill to stop the disengagement problem,” said Openheimer. The settlers' Yesha Council also condemned those behind the Pulsa Dinura against Sharon. “The struggle against the expulsion must be waged for the hearts and minds of the nation, which is certainly not helped by little ‘ceremonies’ like this,” said the Council in a press statement. Religious leaders respond Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Meztger said that “any threats, including verbal threats, are forbidden. Its wrong to use religious means to express extremist opinions. Such acts constitute a defilement of God’s name, and they drag the name of Jewish values through the mud. There is no reason the world that can justify threatening the life of Israel’s leader.” Shas leader and Knesset Member Eli Yishai attacked those behind the incident, calling it “wholly inappropriate” and “lacking any wisdom or understanding. People should work for the love and unity of Israel, not for hatred between the people. Unity will prevent these dubious people from returning us to bitter days.” Deputy Minister Michael Melchior (Meimad) called on the heads of the religious-Zionist movement to immediately hand in those who participated in the ceremony. “Religious Zionism can’t lose all restraint in its opposition to the pullout,” said Melchior. Knesset Member Yosef Paritzky, an ex-Shinui party minister, said the incident was “a barbaric ceremony conducted by pagans. The hallucinatory right is busy with ceremonies and the sane center is busy with disengagement. From my perspective, that can go on. I hope that the Shin Bet, whose job it is to protect the prime minister, learned from its mistakes from the murder of Rabin.” Ilan Marciano contributed to this report Arrest On Sight - Ariel Sharon, Sociopath By Barry Chamish (a Jew living in Israel) Watching a National Geographic documentary called The Truth About Killing, I learned that during WW2, the American army was distressed to learn that only 2% of its combat soldiers shot to kill. This statistic was confirmed in numerous studies after the war. Even in combat, 98% of humanity is not capable of killing their fellow man. The 2% who are capable, are clinical sociopaths. Half of these sociopaths will only kill if convinced they are doing the right thing. The other half kill for the love of it. Ariel Sharon falls into the second category. A sociopath is defined as someone without empathy for humanity, who has no concept of inflicting misery. Sociopaths are society's violent criminal class and are only admired in wartime. Sharon's whole life has been sociopathic. A leader of Unit 101 in the 1950s, his task was to lead retaliatory raids after Arab terror attacks. He was severely reprimanded for leading a massacre of a Jordanian village, during which, legend tells, he personally slaughtered over 50 villagers. During the Lebanon War, Defence Minister Sharon permitted a force of Christian militia to run amok in Sabra and Shatilla from Friday to Monday morning. He knew exactly what the force would do, knew when they were doing it and permitted 800 people to be slaughtered. There isn't an Israeli who doesn't suspect the deaths of his first wife and his son. The sociopath desired to marry his first wife's sister, so she had to go. Those who don't suspect foul play simply believe, "He drove her to suicide." Of his total lack of empathy, in 1982 the IDF needed the cruelest general it had to remove the unwilling residents of Yamit from their homes in the Sinai. Apparently he was more than merely the first choice. No one else was even considered for the task. Certain characteristics pervade all sociopaths. First, they lie without conscience. In fact, they cannot tell the difference between truth and lies. Sharon's long history of lying can be summed up in Menachem Begin's famous observation of Sharon's leadership during the Lebanon War: "If I want to know what Sharon is really doing, I have to read it in tomorrow's papers." Even Sharon's allies in the rape of Gush Katif know he is a pathological liar: Extreme left-wing MK Zahava Gal'on (Meretz-Yachad): "There is no better guarantee that we will leave a certain place than when Sharon says that we will remain there forever. He also said that about Netzarim, when he said that Netzarim's future is like that of Tel Aviv." Another characteristic of sociopaths is that they are bullies. Here is A Portrait Of The Young Sociopath: MK Tzvi Hendel (National Union), a resident of Gush Katif and one of Sharon's most bitter opponents, said, "Sharon is a liar. He knows that the only one who can lead to a civil war is he himself." Now what happens when a sociopath is used by much bigger sociopaths ruling Europe and America? He gets to wreck the foundations of his nation. Sharon is planning to use 55,000 IDF soldiers to drag Jews in Gush Katif by their hair onto trucks. When that day comes, my children will never serve in the IDF. My son is just three years away from the draft, and we are discussing the strategies we will use to keep him from ever wearing the sullied uniform of an enemy army. And that is what the IDF will become; an enemy of the Jews. Throughout the country, fathers are having the same discussion with their children. The sociopath Sharon has torn the fabric of the country into shreds and will wreck the army without remorse. When the pillage of Gush Katif ends, families throughout the land will decide that they'd rather be overrun by the Arabs than have their children disgrace themselves by being seen in an IDF uniform.
|
|
IGNORES DEFINITION OF "SEMITE" Signed into law by George Bush Junior who performs annual ritual human sacrifice to Hebrew god Molech at Jewish homosexual nudist colony at Bohemian Grove
S.2292 [DOCID: f:publ332.108]
[[Page 1281]]
GLOBAL ANTI-SEMITISM REVIEW ACT OF 2004
[[Page 118 STAT. 1282]]
Public Law 108-332
108th Congress
An Act
To require a report on acts of anti-Semitism around the
world. <<NOTE: Oct. 16, 2004 - [S. 2292]>>
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Global Anti-
Semitism Review Act of 2004. 22 USC 2651 note.>>
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of
2004''.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 22 USC 2731 note.>> FINDINGS.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Acts of anti-Semitism in countries throughout the world,
including some of the world's strongest democracies, have
increased significantly in frequency and scope over the last
several years.
(2) During the last 3 months of 2003 and the first 3 months
of 2004, there were numerous instances of anti-Semitic violence
around the world, including the following incidents:
(A) <<NOTE: Mahatir Mohammad.>> In Putrajaya,
Malaysia, on October 16, 2003, former Prime Minister
Mahatir Mohammad told the 57 national leaders assembled
for the Organization of the Islamic Conference that Jews
``rule the world by proxy'', and called for a ``final
victory'' by the world's 1.3 billion Muslims, who, he
said, ``cannot be defeated by a few million Jews.''.
(B) In Istanbul, Turkey, on November 15, 2003,
simultaneous car bombs exploded outside two synagogues
filled with worshippers, killing 24 people and wounding
more than 250 people.
(C) In Australia on January 5, 2004, poison was used
to ignite, and burn anti-Semitic slogans into, the lawns
of the Parliament House in the state of Tasmania.
(D) In St. Petersburg, Russia, on February 15, 2004,
vandals desecrated approximately 50 gravestones in a
Jewish cemetery, painting the stones with swastikas and
anti-Semitic graffiti.
(E) In Toronto, Canada, over the weekend of March 19
through March 21, 2004, vandals attacked a Jewish
school, a Jewish cemetery, and area synagogues, painting
swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans on the walls of a
synagogue and on residential property in a nearby,
predominantly Jewish, neighborhood.
(F) In Toulon, France, on March 23, 2004, a Jewish
synagogue and community center were set on fire.
(3) Anti-Semitism in old and new forms is also increasingly
emanating from the Arab and Muslim world on a sustained
[[Page 118 STAT. 1283]]
basis, including through books published by government-owned
publishing houses in Egypt and other Arab countries.
(4) In November 2002, state-run television in Egypt
broadcast the anti-Semitic series entitled ``Horseman Without a
Horse'', which is based upon the fictitious conspiracy theory
known as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The Protocols have
been used throughout the last century by despots such as Adolf
Hitler to justify violence against Jews.
(5) In November 2003, Arab television featured an anti-
Semitic series, entitled ``Ash-Shatat'' (or ``The Diaspora''),
which depicts Jewish people hatching a plot for Jewish control
of the world.
(6) The sharp rise in anti-Semitic violence has caused
international organizations such as the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to elevate, and bring
renewed focus to, the issue, including the convening by the OSCE
in June 2003 of a conference in Vienna dedicated solely to the
issue of anti-Semitism.
(7) <<NOTE: Ed Koch.>> The OSCE convened a conference again
on April 28-29, 2004, in Berlin, to address the problem of anti-
Semitism with the United States delegation led by former Mayor
of New York City, Ed Koch.
(8) The United States Government has strongly supported
efforts to address anti-Semitism through bilateral relationships
and interaction with international organizations such as the
OSCE, the European Union, and the United Nations.
(9) Congress has consistently supported efforts to address
the rise in anti-Semitic violence. During the 107th Congress,
both the Senate and the House of Representatives passed
resolutions expressing strong concern with the sharp escalation
of anti-Semitic violence in Europe and calling on the Department
of State to thoroughly document the phenomenon.
(10) Anti-Semitism has at times taken the form of
vilification of Zionism, the Jewish national movement, and
incitement against Israel.
SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the United States Government should continue to strongly
support efforts to combat anti-Semitism worldwide through
bilateral relationships and interaction with international
organizations such as the OSCE, the European Union, and the
United Nations; and
(2) the Department of State should thoroughly document acts
of anti-Semitism that occur around the world.
SEC. 4. REPORTS.
Not later than November 15, 2004, the Secretary of State shall
submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the
Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives a
one-time report on acts of anti-Semitism around the world, including a
description of--
(1) acts of physical violence against, or harassment
of, Jewish people, and acts of violence against, or vandalism
of, Jewish community institutions, such as schools, synagogues,
or cemeteries, that occurred in each country;
(2) the responses of the governments of those countries to
such actions;
[[Page 118 STAT. 1284]]
(3) the actions taken by such governments to enact and
enforce laws relating to the protection of the right to
religious freedom of Jewish people;
(4) the efforts by such governments to promote anti-bias and
tolerance education; and
(5) instances of propaganda in government and nongovernment
media that attempt to justify or promote racial hatred or incite
acts of violence against Jewish people.
SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE TO MONITOR AND
COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM.
The State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 is amended by
adding after section 58 (22 U.S.C. 2730) the following new section:
``SEC. 59. <<NOTE: 22 USC 2731.>> MONITORING AND COMBATING ANTI-
SEMITISM.
``(a) Office To Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism.--
``(1) Establishment of office.--The Secretary shall
establish within the Department of State an Office to Monitor
and Combat anti-Semitism (in this section referred to as the
`Office').
``(2) Head of office.--
``(A) Special envoy for monitoring and combating
anti-semitism.--The head of the Office shall be the
Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating anti-Semitism
(in this section referred to as the `Special Envoy').
``(B) Appointment of head of office.--The Secretary
shall appoint the Special Envoy. If the Secretary
determines that such is appropriate, the Secretary may
appoint the Special Envoy from among officers and
employees of the Department. The Secretary may allow
such officer or employee to retain the position (and the
responsibilities associated with such position) held by
such officer or employee prior to the appointment of
such officer or employee to the position of Special
Envoy under this paragraph.
``(b) Purpose of Office.--Upon establishment, the Office shall
assume the primary responsibility for--
``(1) monitoring and combating acts of anti-Semitism and
anti-Semitic incitement that occur in foreign countries;
``(2) coordinating and assisting in the preparation of that
portion of the report required by sections 116(d)(7) and 502B(b)
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151n(d)(7) and
2304(b)) relating to an assessment and description of the nature
and extent of acts of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement
for inclusion in the annual Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices; and
``(3) coordinating and assisting in the preparation of that
portion of the report required by section 102(b)(1)(A)(iv) of
the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C.
6412(b)(1)(A)(iv)) relating to an assessment and description of
the nature and extent of acts of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic
incitement for inclusion in the Annual Report on International
Religious Freedom.
``(c) Consultations.--The Special Envoy shall consult with domestic
and international nongovernmental organizations and multilateral
organizations and institutions, as the Special Envoy considers
appropriate to fulfill the purposes of this section.''.
[[Page 118 STAT. 1285]]
SEC. 6. INCLUSION IN DEPARTMENT OF STATE ANNUAL REPORTS OF
INFORMATION CONCERNING ACTS OF ANTI-SEMITISM
IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.
(a) Inclusion in Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.--The
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.) is amended--
(1) in section 116(d) (22 U.S.C. 2151n(d))--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (8), (9), and (10),
as paragraphs (9), (10), and (11), respectively; and
(B) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following
new paragraph:
``(8) wherever applicable, a description of the nature and
extent of acts of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that
occur during the preceding year, including descriptions of--
``(A) acts of physical violence against, or
harassment of Jewish people, and acts of violence
against, or vandalism of Jewish community institutions,
including schools, synagogues, and cemeteries;
``(B) instances of propaganda in government and
nongovernment media that attempt to justify or promote
racial hatred or incite acts of violence against Jewish
people;
``(C) the actions, if any, taken by the government
of the country to respond to such violence and attacks
or to eliminate such propaganda or incitement;
``(D) the actions taken by such government to enact
and enforce laws relating to the protection of the right
to religious freedom of Jewish people; and
``(E) the efforts of such government to promote
anti-bias and tolerance education;''; and
(2) after the fourth sentence of section 502B(b) (22 U.S.C.
2304(b)), by inserting the following new sentence: ``Wherever
applicable, a description of the nature and extent of acts of
anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that occur, including
the descriptions of such acts required under section
116(d)(8).''.
(b) Inclusion in Annual Report on International Religious Freedom.--
Section 102(b)(1)(A) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998
(22 U.S.C. 6412(b)(1)(A)) is amended--
(1) in clause (ii), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in clause (iii), by striking the period at the end and
inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding after clause (iii) the following new clause:
``(iv) wherever applicable, an assessment and
description of the nature and extent of acts of
anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that
occur in that country during the preceding year,
including--
``(I) acts of physical violence
against, or harassment of, Jewish
people, acts of violence against, or
vandalism of, Jewish community
institutions, and instances of
propaganda in government and
nongovernment media that incite such
acts; and
``(II) the actions taken by the
government of that country to respond to
such violence and attacks or to
eliminate such propaganda or incitement,
to enact and enforce laws relating to
the protection of the right to religious
freedom of
[[Page 118 STAT. 1286]]
Jewish people, and to promote anti-bias
and tolerance education.''.
(c) <<NOTE: Applicability. 22 USC 2151n note.>> Effective Date of
Inclusions.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall apply
beginning with the first report under sections 116(d) and 502B(b) of the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151n(d) and 2304(b)) and
section 102(b) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22
U.S.C. 6312(b)) submitted more than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
Approved October 16, 2004.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2292:
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
May 7, considered and passed Senate.
Oct. 8, considered and passed House, amended.
Oct. 10, Senate concurred in House amendments.
<all>
Arab Reactions to the U.S.'s Global Antisemitism Review Act of 2004 By Aluma Dankowitz Introduction In October 2004, U.S. President George W. Bush signed into law the Global Antisemitism Review Act of 2004. Under this act, the U.S. will "continue to strongly support efforts to combat antisemitism worldwide through bilateral relationships and interaction with international organizations such as the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the European Union, and the United Nations." In addition, the State Department is directed to appoint a special envoy to monitor and combat antisemitism around the world. The preface to the law states that it has been observed that "acts of antisemitism in countries throughout the world, including some of the world's strongest democracies, have increased significantly in frequency and scope over the last several years, and the sharp rise in antisemitic violence has caused international organizations … to elevate and bring renewed focus to the issue." According to the act, by mid-November 2004 a one-time report on acts of antisemitism around the world, and on the actions taken by the respective governments to counter these acts, is to be submitted to the Senate and to the House of Representatives. Further, a section on antisemitism is henceforth to be added to the annual U.S. State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices and annual reports on International Religious Freedom; this section is to include "a description of the nature and extent of acts of antisemitism and antisemitic incitement that occurred during the preceding year, including descriptions of a) acts of physical violence against or acts of harassment against Jewish people, and acts of violence against or vandalism of Jewish community institutions, including schools, synagogues, and cemeteries; b) instances of propaganda in government and non-government media that attempt to justify or promote racial hatred or incite acts of violence against Jewish people; c) the actions, if any, taken by the government of the country to respond to such violence and attacks or to eliminate such propaganda or incitement; d) the actions taken by such government to enact and enforce laws relating to the protection of the right to religious freedom of Jewish people; and e) the efforts of such government to promote anti-bias and tolerance education." It should be noted that the preface also states that "antisemitism has at times taken the form of vilification of Zionism, the Jewish national movement, and incitement against Israel." However, this is not mentioned in the act itself, and no tracking or monitoring of such vilification and incitement against Israel and Zionism is stipulated. Despite this fact, the law was received with opposition by shapers of public opinion in the Arab world, who claimed that according to the law any criticism of Israeli policy would be considered antisemitism. They called the act an interference in domestic affairs of states, expressed apprehension that its implementation would harm freedom of expression, and protested against what they saw as the considerable Jewish influence in the U.S. Some called the act "racist" because it disregarded the fact that Arabs too are Semites, and the fact that Arabs are also victims of discrimination and persecution. Others claimed that the U.S. was attempting, through this act, to force its values upon the world, and that its arrogance is escalating hatred of it worldwide. Various reactions mentioned The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) as one of the organizations that brought the subject to the public eye and thus to the initiation of this law. In the 10th OSCE Mediterranean Seminar that was held in Sharm El-Sheikh, on November 18th and 19th, Egypt managed to convince the OSCE to expand its focus so as to include Islamphobia as another subject to be monitored. According to Al-Ahram Weekly report, "The organisation is now planning to appoint three special representatives: one to monitor the escalating Islamophobia phenomenon; another for antisemitism; and a third for other types of discrimination, intolerance and xenophobia." The following are the main arguments against the Global Antisemitism Review Act of 2004: The Act Aims at Protecting Israel and Zionism, Not Jews The main argument against the act is that it is political, not humanitarian, and that it is aimed at shielding Israel from legitimate criticism of its policy toward the Arabs. An article in the pro-Saddam London daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi stated that it would "set in law and protect Israeli terror and give Israel's governments a green light to kill, slaughter, and destroy … and will be a drawn sword against all authors, clerics, and politicians who raise their voice in protest – particularly in the Arab homeland and in the Islamic world." The article disparaged President Bush's alleged submission to the American Jewish lobby, and stated that the act is racist: "U.S. President George Bush violates all moral standards by throwing himself into the arms of the Zionist movement … to get the Jewish lobby's votes and to be reelected… None disagree that antisemitism is dangerous and condemned. But what is worrying is the obvious mixing of Judaism with Zionism, and the treating of any criticism of the Hebrew state and its wars of destruction and ethnic cleansing against the Arabs in Palestine as criticism of Semites… We had hoped that President Bush would expand the framework of the act to include all kinds of religious persecution, without distinction or discrimination among the religions… "President Bush cannot ban the plays of William Shakespeare that portray Jews with loathsome descriptions and depict them as bloodsuckers in ' The Merchant of Venice. 'But he can force the Arabs to normalize relations with Israel and reshape their religion and belief in a way that will serve this normalization, without [the Arabs] receiving the minimum of their legitimate rights. This law is racist in content, and hostile to Arabs and Muslims, on the pretext of the danger of antisemitism…" Columnist Muhammad Al-Samak wrote in the Egyptian government daily Al-Ahram that the Arabs oppose antisemitism, but that the way in which the U.S. understands antisemitism sets both the U.S. and Israel against the rest of the world: "In principle, Muslims in general and Arabs in particular cannot but oppose antisemitism. This is not because the Arabs are Semites like the Jews, but because they have paid and are still paying a very high price for antisemitic acts… Antisemitism has two victims, not one: the Jews, who were persecuted, tortured, and burned in the [Nazi] detention camps, and the Arab Muslims and Christians who paid and are still paying the compensation for these crimes because of Europe's guilt complex… "The U.S. has adopted a definition determined by dictionaries and various academic sources - that antisemitism is hatred of Jews, Zionism, or Israel. This means that any criticism of Zionism as a political enterprise is considered antisemitism, and any criticism of Israel's policy, its collective crimes in the West Bank and Gaza, its occupation of parts of Syria and Lebanon, and its threats to blow up the Iranian nuclear plant are also considered antisemitism… "[This definition] establishes a new reality in international relations, which divides the world into two axes - one that is accused of antisemitism, which includes the Islamic world, the Catholic world (Latin America), the Orthodox world (Russia), the Buddhist world (China), and the secular world (the European Union); and another opposing antisemitism, which includes only the U.S. and Israel. Implementing this American law will answer the question of whether this policy will manage to fight or at least calm antisemitism, or in igniting it across the world – not out of hatred for Jews, but out of resentment of Israel and the U.S." Columnist Ahmad Al-Rub'i claimed in the London Arabic-language daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat that the act is designed to protect Israel: "Semitism is a term that includes many peoples. The Jews are Semites, and their Palestinian victims are Semites. If the law [referred] to Semitism, the first among the guilty would have to be Ariel Sharon, who perpetrates crimes against the Semitic Palestinians, murders them, and imposes collective punishment on them. The law's aim is also not to protect the Jews, as there are many Jews in the Hebrew state and outside it who oppose Israel's policy, and American Jews who are persecuted and boycotted by the large American media institutions for criticizing Israel.
"This law is to protect Israel, but the name given it is [the law against] antisemitism. Thus it is our honor to join many authors and political commentators on the American State Department's list of antisemites – as long as Semitism in President Bush's law refers to Israel … which specializes in imitating the Nazi state…" A particularly harsh charge was leveled by Ghazi Al-Aridhi, columnist for the Saudi daily Al-Riyadh, who claimed that the law permits Israel to harm Jews and place the blame on others: "The Israeli attack on Europe, and particularly on France and some of the European societies with Jews, is developing, and this time the headline is 'antisemitism.' The Israeli intelligence apparatuses have carried out operations against Jewish targets in France, with the aim of blaming the Muslims and frightening and unsettling French Jews [so as to] underline that they must leave France for their motherland, Israel… The [Global Antisemitism Review] Act enables Israel, by means of its [security] apparatuses, to carry out any operation against Jewish institutions or individuals across the world, and to blame its 'enemies' [for it]… "Everyone [will be subject] to condemnation and charges of antisemitism and supporting terrorism if they criticize Israel… This is a 'law against hatred of Israel,' yet at the same time the law of the jungle applies regarding hatred of Arabs and Muslims, and regarding the expropriation of their homes, property, and institutions…" The Act Harms Freedom of Expression and Constitutes Interference in Domestic Affairs Another frequent argument against the act is that it harms freedom of expression and contradicts the declared principles of the U.S. In the Egyptian government daily Al-Ahram, columnist Dr. Mahmoud Suleiman claimed that the new law is a blow to freedom of expression and constitutes foreign interference in the domestic affairs of sovereign countries: "According to this law, criticism of the murder of women and children, of the expulsion of thousands after destroying their homes, and of the expropriation of agricultural lands – as the Israeli occupation forces are doing – is to be included in the framework of [the term] antisemitism… "The importance of this development lies in the transfer of the monitoring and overseeing authorities from American non-government organizations … to the official level – to the State Department… Had a neutral body prepared this bill, it would not have been interested solely in Jews or antisemitism (a term which would include Arabs), but [also] in the danger of any statement or deed characterized by racism or hostility towards the monotheistic religions, and it would equally condemn Israeli declarations full of expressions of harm to Arabs and Islam… "The act stands in essential contradiction to all the calls by the U.S., past and present, for democracy, equality, and non-discrimination. Similarly, it stands in essential contradiction to fundamental human rights, first and foremost freedom of expression. [This act] constitutes interference in the domestic affairs [of states] because it grants the special envoy responsible for monitoring, and the members of the American missions in the world capitals, the right to monitor and oversee matters that are at the center of the domestic affairs of the state. "Similarly, [the law] is a kind of extortion, because it links financial aid [by the U.S.] to muzzling mouths…" Dr. Mustafa Abd Al-Ghani also argued in the Egyptian daily Al-Ahram that the act is a blow to freedom of expression, saying that with this new law, "the Jews will be able to spread brazenly across the world, and do as they wish, with the imperialist master of the world standing alongside them and supporting them – and even making laws and [issuing] communiqués to protect only the human rights of the Jew. [This] is because of election interests, or under pressure by the conservative right [in the U.S.], or under the influence of people or research organizations which for the most part represent a group from among the new Orientalists… [Conservative right-wingers who support the act] have links to organizations such as MEMRI, which today fill the role of placing blame and demanding the trial of anyone tempted to say anything that could be construed as self-defense against the strong…" In another article, Dr. Abd Al-Ghani again mentions "the Zionist organization MEMRI," claiming that MEMRI "brazenly plotted against the UAE cultural center, the Zayed Center, because it was neutral and hosted many [figures] who influenced reality with their thought… The attack on the Zayed Center accused it of hostility to the U.S., encouraging antisemitism, disseminating conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial, and the like, and ultimately the center was shut down… We are in the age of Zionists, who have taken over Evangelistic thought and human thought in general, and in the name of 'the Jews' have begun to talk about acting to issue laws against others – the ' Goyim,' as they call their enemies, whose sentence is always death…" The Qatari daily Al-Sharq stated that the act was a form of "intellectual terror": "Bush's ratification of this law again underlines the Jewish influence that is spreading powerfully in the current American administration… The natural result of this law will be a kind of 'intellectual terror' by the American administration, in the guise of laws through which every opinion critical of Israel and its terrorist deeds, particularly in our Arab region, will be banned. Moreover, anyone with a [critical] opinion will stand trial. Thus we find ourselves facing new American support for Israeli policy… "In our view, this law will expand the cycle of the enemies of the current American administration, which is going overboard in its blatant bias towards Israel…" The Americans Want to Force their Values on the World
Egyptian intellectual Dr. Abd Al-Wahhab Al-Masiri, author of the encyclopedia ' Jews, Judaism, and Zionism,'stated: "The law is part of the American attack on the world." He added: "The U.S. wants to stress its hegemony [in the world, and to this end] it sometimes uses the issue of democracy, sometimes the issue of human rights, and recently [the issue of] antisemitism. All [these issues] are tools the U.S. uses to interfere in the affairs of other countries and to force its policy and outlook upon them." Egyptian journalist Hassan Abu Taleb, editor of the ' Arab Strategic Report,' also criticized the act in the Saudi daily Al-Watan ¸ claiming that the U.S. is trying to force its values upon the world: "This is not the first time that the American legislative authority has set itself up as the legislative authority of the entire world. It is forcing its patronage on the world, and showing particular perceptions that stem from the distinct American experience, which it is trying to force on the rest of the countries… It is acting to oblige national governments to accept [these perceptions] as if national sovereignty were meaningless, and treats these national governments as if they are only local governments in an American state. "We have seen this behavior in the past, in the American law on religious freedom in the world. This law assumes that the situation of religions across the world is like the American model, where anyone can establish a religion as he pleases … without addressing the fact that there are sacred monotheistic religions that must not be harmed in any way, and anyone who is not a member of them and does not believe in them is forbidden from expressing an opinion on them… "The Bush administration is planning to directly interfere in what is written, published, and distributed by the Jewish phenomenon in the Arab and Islamic countries – as if there is a need to give absolute protection to the Jews, because they are a select group that must not be criticized in any way. This is a group that stands above the law and above international human rights conventions that do not differentiate among groups according to any criterion. "The danger is becoming more evident in light of the meaning that the accursed law has adopted – according to which all criticism of Israel, particularly of its inhumane and barbaric actions against the Palestinians, is included in the term 'antisemitism.' The law ostensibly says that anyone who dares criticize the Jewish state, Israel, even politically, no different than [criticism leveled] at any country in the world – including the U.S. itself – is expressing hatred of the Jews… "The accursed law does not recognize that the Arabs are Semites, nor that discrimination against them is increasing … in some European countries and in the U.S. itself, [facts] that should have been mentioned [in the law] – [at least] in a single word. [By ignoring these facts] the law constitutes outrageous discrimination on the basis of religion and race… "It is not enough to ignore the existence of the law… The minimum [required] is for the Organization of the Islamic Conference to issue a communiqué rejecting the law altogether, and [by so doing it will] serve as a model for the Islamic countries not to maintain relations with the special American envoy for antisemitism. "The minimum is also for the Arab countries to unite against the law and reject every form of interference [in their affairs] that aims to prevent freedom of expression and creativity, [including] criticism of the ugly face of Israel's policy..." |
|
SPECIAL EMERGENCY ALERT THE REAL MOTIVE BEHIND THE “DEPARTMENT OF GLOBAL ANTI-SEMITISM” By Rev. Ted Pike On October 16, 2004 President Bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. It establishes a special department within the U.S. State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism, reporting annually to Congress. This is more “Hate Crimes” legislation, orchestrated by the international Jewish religious, educational, and fraternal organization, B’nai B’rith, and its Anti-Defamation League. The new “Department of Global Anti-Semitism” is designed to make critics of Israel not only into “anti-Semites” but ultimately into “domestic terrorists.” But first, what is anti-Semitism? Simple: It is the racist belief that Jews, because of heredity, are evil, greedy, corrupting, subversive, degenerate, etc. Hitler believed this. So do the KKK and certain “Christian identity” and white supremacist groups. Such dehumanization of Jews is evil, un-Christian, un-American. On the other hand, if the actions of individual Jews, Jewish institutions, Jewish religious or secular leaders, or the nation Israel have been evil, then vehement criticism is not anti-Semitic. It is courageous and laudable. Certainly, the Biblical prophets, including Christ, engaged in vitriolic criticism of the sinful nation Israel and its false leaders. No one considers them anti-Semitic. TWISTED DEFINITIONS OF “ANTI-SEMITISM” However, in its “Report on Global Anti-Semitism” and “Global Anti-Semitism Report,” the U.S. State Department ignores the above perspectives. Here is a list of beliefs or activities the U.S. government now considers anti-Semitic:
ANTI-SEMITISM IS A “HATE CRIME” In the Global Anti-Semitism Report, State Department spokespersons Ambassador Edward O’Donnell and the head of the office of global anti-Semitism, Ambassador Michael B. Kozak, defend the State Department’s definitions. O’Donnell’s statement that he wants to “end all anti-Semitism and other hate crimes” reveals that he considers anti-Semitism a hate crime. Presumably, he would like such a “crime” to be punished. These State Department reports repeatedly equate “strong, anti-Israel sentiment” and criticism of matters Jewish with “hate.” They give no recognition to the possibility that such criticism might be sincerely motivated not by hate but by moral indignation or even love for the Jewish people. The Report on Global Anti-Semitism repeatedly calls for passage, both nationally and internationally, of “hate crime” legislation. These laws, the brainchild of B’nai B’rith/ADL, also have as their ultimate goal making it a “hate crime” to criticize Jews, matters Jewish, or the state of Israel. The Report on Global Anti-Semitism reeks with B’nai B’rith/ADL logic, phraseology, and evidence of their incredible worldwide organizational and statistic-gathering capacities. It contains thirty-three pages of minute documentation of “anti-Semitic incidents” in fifty-eight countries of the world, documentation which only B’nai B’rith/ADL, with its offices in more than fifty countries, could compile or even be that vitally interested in. Without a doubt, as with hate laws, this Global Anti-Semitism Review Act is their creation. CRITICISM-FREE ZONE FOR JEWS Thus, the Department of Anti-Semitism, applauded and advised by B’nai B’rith/ADL, is working to create a worldwide “criticism-free zone” for Jews in the “New World Order” that is coming. This report ignores whether criticisms of matters Jewish are true. What must be defended are the sensitivities of the Jewish people! Consequently, relating such unflattering realities as the anti-Christian, anti-Gentile contents of the Talmud and Kabbalah, Jewish origins of bolshevism, Jewish dominance of Hollywood and the media, Jewish control of Congress through AIPAC, Zionist atrocities and abrasiveness in the Middle East is anti-Semitic. It is “hate.” It does not matter that such facts can be easily and extensively documented, often from impeccable Jewish sources such as the Encyclopedia Judaica. All such anti-Semitism, this report says, is a “scourge,” an “intolerable burden,” which “for an increasingly interdependent world…must be ended.” On the other hand, according to the U.S. State Department, there does exist some possibility that “objective criticism” of Israel and its leaders can be tolerated - that is, just as long as such criticism does not “cross the line” and become “strong anti-Israel sentiment” and “virulent.” Such criticism should not “demonize” Jews, Jewish religious or political leaders, or the state of Israel. However, what may be considered “virulence” or “demonization” by Zionists may be seen as nothing more than salty truth-telling by critics of Israel. Hypocritically, the State Department itself is not above “demonizing” strong critics of Israel in the most “virulent” terms as a “plague” and “scourge” on mankind! TURNING “ANTI-SEMITISM” INTO “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” The State Department’s twisted definition of anti-Semitism provides exponential opportunities to persecute Bible-believing Christians, anti-war activists, Moslems, as well as publishers and broadcasters in the years ahead. In fact, by turning “strong” criticism of the American/Zionist coalition into “anti-Semitism and other hate crimes,” the State Department opens the door to eventual characterization of those who criticize Israel as not only anti-Semites but also as “domestic terrorists.” Here’s how it can be done: Today, those who raise funds in America to support America’s and Israel’s terrorist enemies are arrested as “domestic terrorists.” But what if articulate Americans provided something else, potentially even more valuable to Israel’s enemies: “strong criticism” of Israel? Such could weaken Israel morally in the sight of the world, giving justification to the claims of her terrorist enemies. Should they also be punished? As the Second World War was beginning in 1939, Charles Lindberg was publicly critical of international Jews for inveigling America into a war to destroy Hitler. Lindberg believed that Hitler should be allowed to do what he wanted to do most, move east and destroy “Jewish Communism” in Russia. In 1944, 30 Americans, who agreed with Lindberg, were arrested for the crime of “sedition,” weakening America’s resolve in the fight against fascism. Later investigation under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that the ADL, attempting to equate criticism of international Jews with Nazism, had entirely created the FBI case. Records revealed that the ADL was “only warming up” by pursuing sedition convictions against 30 innocent Americans. Their ultimate ambition was to imprison prominent critics of evil Jewish leadership, especially Charles Lindberg. Fortunately, ADL’s attempt to transform 30 critics of international Jews into “Nazis” failed when the judge died and the case was dissolved. Today, America and Israel are allies in the “war on terror.” Tomorrow, especially if the war on terror intensifies and America and Israel cooperate even more closely, criticism of America’s ally in the war on terrorism may be construed as “aiding and abetting the enemy.” Such “strong criticism” or anti-Semitism may be seen as not only weakening Israel, but America itself. Turning millions of Americans into anti-Semites for criticizing Israel is thus a transition toward ADL’s ultimate goal: making such persons “enemies of the war on terror,” i.e., “domestic terrorists.” They then can be prosecuted under Homeland Security laws. CANADA: ALREADY MAKING “ANTI-SEMITES” INTO “DOMESTIC TERRORISTS” In Canada, we are seeing exactly this happen. Ernst Zundel is a Holocaust revisionist who doubts that a full six million Jews were deliberately murdered by the Nazis, largely by gassing. He asserts that untold numbers of Jews in German internment camps, especially in the last years of the war, died not in gas chambers, but as a result of massive, well-documented typhus epidemics, which also killed countless Poles, Gypsies, Russians, etc. Yet in Canada, thanks to ADL/B’nai B’rith, it is a “hate crime” to lesson to any degree the six million figure of Holocaust dead, or that most of them died in gas chambers. Such diminishment is anti-Semitism, a “hate crime” punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment. Several years ago Zundel was deported from his home in Tennessee back to Canada to spend more than two years in solitary confinement in a Canadian prison. He was then deported back to his native Germany where he remains in prison. Under what charge have Canadian authorities been holding him? You guessed it. He is a “terrorist threat!” So it will be for millions of Americans tomorrow if ADL/B’nai B’rith have their way and the Department of Anti-Semitism’s twisted definitions of anti-Semitism are allowed to stand. The Department of Global Anti-Semitism is informing the world who the “domestic terrorists” of tomorrow will be. They are you and I. WHAT CAN WE DO? We can do plenty! Call our members of Congress toll-free at 1-877-762-8762 Call the U.S. State Department comment line at 1-202-647-4000 Demand that all funding and authority for the development of the Department of Anti-Semitism be rescinded. Demand that Congressional hearings be held to re-formulate a workable, balanced definition of “anti-Semitism” - one that protects Bible-believing Christians, critics of Israel, and Moslems from persecution as “anti-Semites.” Also, call into talk shows, especially large, syndicated ones. Since the threat of hate laws is “taboo” on most large shows, do not tell the talk show operator that you want to comment on that subject. If the topic of the day is even remotely related to the issue of free speech, terrorism, the Mid-East, etc., begin with those topics but quickly move the discussion to the threat of hate laws. Describe how free speech is lost in Canada; how eleven Christians were arrested under Pennsylvania’s hate law; how the “Department of Anti-semitism” would make many Americans into anti-semites. Talk show hosts: For an interview with Rev. Ted Pike on the “Department of Anti-Semitism,” call 503-631-3808. For many articles on “hate crimes” legislation and B’nai B’rith’s role in creating it, visit www.truthtellers.org. For a gripping 80-minute video documentary by Ted Pike, “Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians,” at $24.90 postpaid, call 503-631-3808, order online, download a free copy, or write National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015 ADL wants to jail JewsAgainstZionism.com as "anti-Semites"
|
|
"Masonry ought to be forever abolished. It is wrong -- essentially wrong -- a seed of evil, which can never practice any good." Pedophile Pope seeks immunity in Texas abuse case
Chicago Sun Times Jewish editors put horns on Satanic Pedophile Pope who was a member of Nazi Party - This cover of TIME was NOT altered in any way VATICAN CITY -- Lawyers for Pope Benedict XVI have asked President Bush to declare the pontiff immune from liability in a lawsuit that accuses him of conspiring to cover up the molestation of three boys by a seminarian in Texas, court records show.
The Vatican's embassy in Washington sent a diplomatic memo to the State Department on May 20 requesting the U.S. government grant the pope immunity because he is a head of state, according to a May 26 motion submitted by the pope's lawyers in U.S. District Court for the Southern Division of Texas in Houston.
Joseph Ratzinger is named as a defendant in the civil lawsuit. Now Benedict XVI, he's accused of conspiring with the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston to cover up the abuse during the mid-1990s.
In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Gerry Keener, said Tuesday that the pope is considered a head of state and automatically has diplomatic immunity.
Lawyers for abuse victims say the case is significant because previous attempts to implicate the Vatican, the pope or other church officials in U.S. sex abuse proceedings have failed -- primarily because of immunity claims and the difficulty serving Vatican officials with U.S. lawsuits. Secret Societies. Satan. Mark of the Beast. Apocalyptic Number. Catholic Pope hires Jew to run Catholic religion
Sir Heinz "Henry" Kissinger Jewish Knight of the British Empire officially runs Mafia's Vatican Nation to accellerate overthrow of Christianity
Kissinger to Serve As Papal Adviser
Pope Benedict XVI has invited Henry Kissinger, former adviser to Richard Nixon, to be a political consultant and he accepted.
BY EDWARD PENTIN Kissinger was a treasonous traitor spy employed by Communist Russian KGB during World war II, and recruited Nazi warcriminals for CIA, Pentagon and NASA after WW2. During Gulf War 1 Kissinger's BNL Bank in Atlanta was raided and shut down for arming Saddam Hussein and Iraq for the Sir George Bush Sr Knight of the British Empire White House. Kissinger is a homosexual pedophile rapist and is currently indicted for warcrimes VATICAN CITY — Over the course of his long and controversial career, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has had many titles. Now he reportedly has one more — adviser to the Pope.
According to the Italian newspaper La Stampa, Pope Benedict XVI has invited the 83-year-old former adviser to Richard Nixon to be a political consultant, and Kissinger has accepted.
Quoting an “authoritative” diplomatic source at the Holy See, the paper reported Nov. 4 that the Nobel laureate was asked at a recent private audience with the Holy Father to form part of a papal “advisory board” on foreign and political affairs.
If true, there is speculation on which issues Kissinger would advise the Holy Father. Relations with Islam, Palestine and Israel, and Iraq — Kissinger has been critical of the conduct of the war but opposes a quick withdrawal — are likely to be high up on the agenda.
It has also been speculated that, in view of the Muslim hostility to Benedict’s recent Regensburg speech, Kissinger might provide advice on dealing with an increasingly fractious Islamic world.
Furthermore, like the Pope, Kissinger has analyzed the challenges of globalization and might provide advice in this area as well.
The recruitment of Kissinger would not be unprecedented. Experts from a variety of disciplines, including the realm of economics, politics and philosophy, are regularly invited to advise popes and Vatican officials on current affairs.
Pope John Paul II was close friends with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Polish-born national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter, partly because both had a common Polish heritage (though this caused the Soviets to suspect the Vatican of “fixing” the election of Karol Wojtyla, which occurred during the Carter presidency).
Similarly to John Paul and Brzezinski, Benedict and Kissinger are close in age and were both born in Bavaria (a Jew, Kissinger and his family fled Nazi Germany before World War II).
Pope preaches brotherhood on Turkey trip
BRIAN MURPHY Pope brings 3,000 man Death Squad to Turkey in November 2006 ANKARA, Turkey - Pope Benedict XVI began his first visit to a Muslim country Tuesday with a message of dialogue and "brotherhood" between Christians and Muslims in an attempt to ease anger over his perceived criticism of Islam.
Two months after the pope touched off fury across the Islamic world with remarks linking violence and Prophet Muhammad, the Turkish prime minister — in a last-minute change of plans — was on hand at the airport in Turkey's capital to greet the pontiff.
"All feel the same responsibility in this difficult moment in history, let's work together," Benedict said during his flight from Rome to Ankara, where more than 3,000 police and sharpshooters joined a security effort that surpassed even the visit of President Bush two years ago.
Police monitored the highway leading to Ankara from the airport, where Turkish and Vatican flags waved in a light breeze. Snipers climbed atop buildings and hilltops. In wooded areas along the route, soldiers in camouflage fatigues set up observation points and sniffer dogs passed along bridges.
The outcome depends partly on the words and gestures of Benedict, who triggered an outcry in September when he quoted a 14th century Christian emperor who characterized the Prophet Muhammad's teachings as "evil and inhuman."
Pope's Evil Eye in Turkey in November 2006 In Ankara, a small protest was held before Benedict's arrival. "You're not welcome, Pope," read a banner.
It was his first visit to a Muslim country as pontiff. The original goal of the pope's trip to Turkey was to meet Bartholomew I, leader of the world's 300 million Orthodox Christians. The two major branches of Christianity represented by Bartholomew and Benedict split in 1054 over differences in opinion on the power of the papacy, and the two spiritual heads will meet in an attempt to breach the divide and reunite the churches.
Benedict leaves Ankara on Wednesday for Ephesus, where the Virgin Mary is thought to have spent her last years, and will then travel to Istanbul, a former Christian metropolis known as Constantinople until Ottoman Turks conquered it in 1453.
On Sunday, more than 25,000 Turks showed up to an anti-Vatican protest in Istanbul, asking the pope to stay at home.
Catholic Pope's Vatican Army
The Jesuit Oath of Induction is also recorded in the Congressional Record of the U.S.A. (House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, Feb. 15, 1913, pp. 3215-3216) It can also be found in the book entitled, "Subterranean Rome" by Charles Didier translated from the French and published in New York in 1843. Dr.
The article below was taken from the book Subterranean Rome by Charles Didier, translated from the French and published in New York in 1843. Dr. Alberto Rivera escaped from the Jesuit Order in 1967, and he describes his Jesuit oath in exactly the same way as it appears in this book. After reading this, ask yourself the question: Is this REALLY the church of Jesus Christ???
"When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS. The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers. Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:"
Superior speaks:
My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.
You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.
You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope's sake, whose servants we are unto death.
You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labors with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved." Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope, repeat after me---
The Extreme Oath of the Jesuits:
"1, _ now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that his holiness the Pope is Christ's Vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation and that they may safely be destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power I shall and will defend this doctrine of his Holiness' right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the now pretended authority and churches of England and Scotland, and branches of the same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere; and all adherents in regard that they be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named Protestants or Liberals, or obedience to any of the laws, magistrates or officers.
I do further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name Protestants or Liberals to be damnable and they themselves damned who will not forsake the same.
I do further declare, that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness' agents in any place wherever I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland or America, or in any other Kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my uttermost to extirpate the heretical Protestants or Liberals' doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, regal or otherwise.
I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with, to assume my religion heretical, for the propaganda of the Mother Church's interest, to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they may entrust me and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstance whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father, or any of this sacred covenant.
I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.
That I may go to any part of the world withersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions of the North, the burning sands of the desert of Africa, or the jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America, without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me.
I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.
In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever!
All of which, I, _, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant."
(He receives the wafer from the Superior and writes his name with the point of his dagger dipped in his own blood taken from over his heart.)
Superior speaks:
"You will now rise to your feet and I will instruct you in the Catechism necessary to make yourself known to any member of the Society of Jesus belonging to this rank.
In the first place, you, as a Brother Jesuit, will with another mutually make the ordinary sign of the cross as any ordinary Roman Catholic would; then one cross his wrists, the palms of his hands open, and the other in answer crosses his feet, one above the other; the first points with forefinger of the right hand to the center of the palm of the left, the other with the forefinger of the left hand points to the center of the palm of the right; the first then with his right hand makes a circle around his head, touching it; the other then with the forefinger of his left hand touches the left side of his body just below his heart; the first then with his right hand draws it across the throat of the other, and the latter then with a dagger down the stomach and abdomen of the first. The first then says Iustum; and the other answers Necar; the first Reges. The other answers Impious." (The meaning of which has already been explained.) "The first will then present a small piece of paper folded in a peculiar manner, four times, which the other will cut longitudinally and on opening the name Jesu will be found written upon the head and arms of a cross three times. You will then give and receive with him the following questions and answers:
Question —From whither do you come? Answer — The Holy faith.
Q. —Whom do you serve?
A. —The Holy Father at Rome, the Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church Universal throughout the world.
Q. —Who commands you?
A. —The Successor of St. Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus or the Soldiers of Jesus Christ.
Q. —Who received you?
A. —A venerable man in white hair.
Q. —How?
A. —With a naked dagger, I kneeling upon the cross beneath the banners of the Pope and of our sacred order.
Q. —Did you take an oath?
A. —I did, to destroy heretics and their governments and rulers, and to spare neither age, sex nor condition. To be as a corpse without any opinion or will of my own, but to implicitly obey my Superiors in all things without hesitation of murmuring.
Q. —Will you do that?
A. —I will.
Q. —How do you travel?
A. —In the bark of Peter the fisherman.
Q. —Whither do you travel?
A. —To the four quarters of the globe.
Q. —For what purpose?
A. —To obey the orders of my general and Superiors and execute the will of the Pope and faithfully fulfill the conditions of my oaths.
Q. —Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated."
Sister Charlotte Wells vs Catholic Convent Cult ![]() George Bush commutes death sentence of Henry Lee Lucas after 600+ Kills with Ottis Toole The Tag Team from Hell: The Sadist King and the Generalissimo of Pain. Serial Killer Hit List The numbers speak for themselves. As a kid, Henry was the poster child of the "Future Serial Killer Club." His alcoholic father, called "No Legs" because of a chance encounter with a freight train, killed himself after repeatedly being humiliated by his abusive wife. When little Henry sliced an eye while playing with a knife with his brother, his bootlegging, prostitute mother -- Viola Lucas -- left his gashed orb unattended for days until it eventually withered and had to be removed by a doctor. Once mom beat him so severely with a piece of wood that he lay in a semi-conscious state for three days before Viola's boyfriend decide to take him to a local hospital. Another time, she cruelly decided to send Hank to school in a dress and with his hair curled. Years later, in a drunken binge, Henry stuck a knife in his mother's back and proceeded to rape her dead corpse. Later, like on many other occasions, he recanted his act of inscestuous necrophilia. He got 40 years for matricide, but was out after 10. Free again, Henry launched his stellar career as the nation's most notorious random killer. In 1976, after a chance meeting in a Jacksonville soup kitchen, he joined up with a part-time transvestite and deeply psychotic retard, Ottis Toole, to carry out numerous homicidal escapades. Ottis had a taste for human flesh and had many of his victims for dinner. Henry, however, was not a cannibal because, he said, he disliked the taste of Ottis' barbecue sauce. He was more of a sadist and a necrophile, preferring sex with mutilated bodies and live or dead animals. The consummate killer couple, they enjoyed picking up hitchhikers to satisfy their lust for blood. Sometimes, when they didn't want to go through the hassle of killing and disposing of their prey, they would just run over the occasional hitchhiker and continue on their merry way. These lethal lovebirds parted ways after Ottis' niece, Becky Powell, shacked up with Henry at the age of seven. The unfortunate lassie was found at the age of fifteen dismembered, stuffed in pillowcases and strewn over a field. After his arrest, Lucas toured the country as a star killer uncovering evidence of his handiwork for local police departments. In 1985, Dallas Times-Herald journalist, Hugh Aynesworth, claimed their reign of terror was a hoax and that overzealous detectives fed the would-be killers many details of their crimes. Henry and Ottis confessed to more than 600 killings in 26 states. Henry even claimed to have carried the poison to Guyana as a favor to his good friend Jim Jones [CIA mind-kontrol experiment in genocide/homicide]. Many investigators still believe that Lucas -- a fifth-grade dropout -- was responsible for just a couple of murders and the real criminals were the officers who fed him information on unresolved cases and coerced confessions. Serial killer expert Robert Ressler believes Henry might be responsible for as little as five killings. The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. To many investigators' surprise one of Henry's earliest alleged victims, a Virginia schoolteacher, was found alive and kicking as he was charged with her murder. Not one to hold back his most outrageous boasts, he claimed to have committed murders in Spain and Japan eventhough there's no evidence suggesting he ever left the United States. Some of the crimes, he said, were committed under orders from the Satanic cult, the [CIA] "Hand of Death." After confessing to over 300 hits, Hank recanted it all only to confess again when he became born-agai. As he awaits execution on Death Row in Texas, Hank still mentions bits and pieces of evidence linking him to numerous killings in 18 states. Meanwhile back in Florida, Ottis was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic and his death sentence was commuted to six consecutive life termss. In prison Ottis confessed and later recanted killing 6-year-old Adam Walsh, whose 1981 disappearance outside a Hollywood, Florida, mall set off a nationwide manhunt and launched the TV career of his father, John Walsh, as the creator and host of the Fox television series "America's Most Wanted." On September 15, 1996, Ottis died in a prison hospital of liver failure. Walsh, who repeatedly criticized the police handling of his son's case, questioned why investigators did not try to interview Toole on his deathbed or try for another confession. Speaking from prison after Ottis' death, Lucas said Toole killed Adam and later showed him the remains of the boy in a shallow grave. "I got sick about it. I said let's get the hell out of here." On March 31, 1998, Texas State District Judge John Carter set June 30 as the execution date for Henry Lee. Although his many confessions, he was sentenced to death for the 1979 murder of a female hitchhiker known as "Orange Socks" for the only item of clothing left on her body. During many of his detractions Lucas claimed that he was working as a roofer in Florida when the hitchhiker was killed. No execution date had been set for Lucas until now. He was granted a stay in September 1995 so his claims of false confessions could be investigated. The stay was lifted a year later. On June 27, 1998 Governor George W. Bush spared Henry's life because of overwhelming evidence proving that Henry was not in Texas when "Orange Socks" was murdered. Although Lucas confessed to killing her, work records and a cashed paycheck indicated he was in Florida at the time of the murder. Bush issued the reprieve on the recommendation of the state parole board. "I can only thank them for believing the truth and having guts enough for standing up for what's right," Lucas said from death row. "Henry Lee Lucas is unquestionably guilty of other despicable crimes which he has been sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison," said Bush, in Brownsville for a conference of U.S.-Mexico border state governors. "However, I believe there is enough doubt about this particular crime that the state of Texas should not impose its ultimate penalty by executing him."
An Interview With Ottis Toole: The Cannibal Kid The confessed serial killer who chopped the head off Adam Walsh but was never prosecuted by the State of Florida for that crime By Billy Bob Barton |
|
The following article is reprinted from Mike Diana's "The Worst Of Boiled Angel". Ottis Toole is a convicted killer responsible for, by his own approximations, hundred of deaths. The included tabloid article is taken from the October 15, 1996 issue of 'GLOBE'. Let me tell you something: as a crime beat journalist I've met every kind of criminal scum known to mankind, a few I believed were aliens from other planets. I've interviewed Ted Bundy who knawed on the naked buttocks of a dead college coed and who fucked the week-old rotting, headless corpse of Denise Noslund in Washington State. The law never got him for that one, Bundy fried for strangling and raping the remains of a Florida schoolgirl. Bundy was so depraved that he radiated evil like a supernova. Pure scumbag. I've chatted with serial murderess Margie Barfield who had a habit of poisoning her victims. I saw her at the North Carolina Prison for Women shortly before she was executed. She was smiling, hymn-singing, bible-thumping bag of shit who'd make you feel comfortable while pouring rat poison down your throat. I've talked to the worst criminals on Earth - or so I thought - but nothing prepared me for my meeting with Ottis Toole, the infamous Cannibal Kid, who recently was sentenced to a mandatory 100 years in North Florida. I wrote this character a letter while he was in prison near Appilachocola but didn't catch up to him until he was sent to the infamous Florida State Prison near Starke. The Florida State Prison is a built on a pestiferous swamp. The mosquitos almost sucked me dry as I waited to be cleared for entry into this state sponsored septic tank of a prison. A sweating fat black maggot of a prison cop wearing a shit-brown uniform examined my credentials as the vermin attacked my bare skin. I swatted the bugs as the insolent toad looked me over as if I was a new arrival for the eletric chair. There isn't any speices of human lower than a prison guard. They're far more corrupt than the criminals they watch over. In my oppinion, they're blubbergutted, tobacco spitting, animated balls of feces. Only a pervert would work in a prison and at the Florida State Prison I saw these brown-shirted perverts aplenty. Finally I was approved for entry into the prison and was escorted to the interview area by a swishing, limp-wristed homosexual "Classification Specialist". I was afraid to ask what the pussy-boy specialized in. "He" was a "she" and a genuine charmer. Finally I was put in a little room and a chained human monster by the name of Ottis Toole was led in by a squad of prison goons. They threw Toole into a chair but left the chains on him. Toole glared at their backs as they left the room. Finally he looked at me; I looked at him andsaid, "I'm Billy Bob. Is it true you eat people or that is just bullshit?" Toole looked me over as if I were a whopper and said "You look damn tasty. If I had me a knife I'd slit your throat and drink some blood." I noticed Toole began to drool a bit at the idea of dicing me up for stewmeat. His eyes were red and crazy, he began to pant and hiss like a hungry animal. He liked the idea of munching on human meat. Barton: They tell me you eat young boys. Toole: I've eaten my share. Barton: Tell me about it. Toole: First I go out and catch me a little boy, maybe go down to a mall or shopping center and grab one there...grab him, tie him up, use a gag, put him in the trunk of my car and drive him to my place out in the swamps. Nobody to bother me way out there. Barton: Did you rape those boys? Toole: Yeah, I give it to 'em in the butt. Barton: Make them scream? Toole: Naw, they have on a gag. Can't scream. Barton: Ever fuck little girls? Toole: Sure. Fuck 'em in the butt same as a boy. Barton: Yeah, why's that? Toole: A girl 8 or 9 years old, her pussy ain't able to take a big dick. She can take it up her butt same as a boy. I prefer a boy. I make his peter get hard, a boy maybe 12 years old, I can make him shoot jizz every time while I'm up his ass. A girl, she doesn't do nothing. Ain't much fun. Barton: You fuck 'em, then you kill 'em? Toole: Yeah. So what? I like it. Barton: Ever kill any adult people? Toole: Plenty of 'em. All the time - men, women, kids. Barton: How'd you kill them? Toole: All kinds of ways. Strangle some with a belt. Shoot some. Cut some throats. Barton: I read where you use a bar-b-que sauce when you eat those kids. Is that true? Toole: Yeah, I have my own recipe. Barton: Tell me how you cook a young boy or girl. Toole: After the fucking then you strip them naked and hang them upside down by the ankles; then slit their throat with a knife, slit the belly and take out the guts, the liver, the heart. Cut off the head. Let the blood drain. Barton: Do you have a big fire? Toole: A pit. A bar-b-que pit. Charcoal so there ain't much smoke. Take down the body, put the metal spit through them. Put it into the asshole, through the body and out the neck, wire the meat to the spit, put it on the spit-holder over the coals. Damn tasty. Barton: Just how does a little boy bar-b-que taste, Ottis? Toole: Same as a roasted piglet. Boys and girls taste about the same when you roast them 8 to 10 years old. The flavor is a shade different when they're teenagers. The boys are gamier than the girls. Give me the roasted meat of a boy age 14 and a girl age 14 and I can tell the difference when you use a spicy sauce. Barton: Ever kill teenagers? Toole: Sure. Get a pair of lovers parking in the woods. Easy to catch them. Teenagers make a nice roast, I do favor a rump roast from a teen. Younger ones I think I prefer ribs. Juicy. Tasty. You ought to try some. Barton: You're a sick fucker! Anyone ever told you that? Toole: Sure. Plenty have told me. I got off death row because they said I'm too sick to burn on the electric chair. Nobody came around to try to cure me. They give me some pill. People eat pigs, cows, horses. I like to eat people. It's good meat, too. You ain't tried it, don't be saying it ain't tasty. You might like it. Barton: How many people have you killed and eaten? Toole: Just me killing them alone or the ones I killed and ate with Henry? Barton: You were doing this with Henry Lucas, too? Toole: Yeah, we'd mostly eat hitch hikers. Barton: All together how many do you think? Toole: Oh, probably about 150 or so. Barton: Incredible! And the police never caught you? Toole: Ain't no police out in the woods. Barton: Henry Lee Lucas says now that he didn't kill all those people, that he was making it all up. What do you say about that? Toole: We killed over 200 when we was roaming the country together. Maybe he killed more before he met me or after we split. I'd say around 200 for sure, I got over 100 my own self. Henry said he got about 400 all together, I don't know for sure. I really don't. Barton: Do you recall any memorable killings? Toole: Oh yeah, I remember Shelly. Barton: Shelly, is that a boy or a girl? Toole: A young woman about 20 or 25, around there. Barton: What do you remember? Toole: I got her when she was hitch hiking in Colorado. I had me an old pick-up truck. I picked her up, took her up into the Rocky Mountains and killed her. She was naked when I killed her. A pretty one. It was the summertime in 1974 and what was funny is that the police blamed the killing on Ted Bundy but Ted didn't get that one, I got her. Barton: Ever hear of anyone else being blamed for killings you did? Toole: Yeah. I got me a Chinese girl out by Colorado Springs in 1974; cut her throat and she had a friend and I stabbed her up, too. The cop got a guy named Estep for that case but I did it. Cops don't always get the right person. Barton: Kill anyone else in Colorado? Toole: Oh yeah, I remember a girl. Ellen, late twenties or early thirties in age, I got her down by Pueblo, Colorado, we rode East. I shot that one, shot her through the head. Barton: Did you fuck them? Toole: Sometimes. I fucked them the way I fuck a boy. Make them take it up the ass. I ain't into pussy but a girl's asshole is about the same as a man's. Barton: Did you eat Patty? Toole: No. Not her. I shot her; didn't eat her or cut off a hunk to eat later. Just left her lying dead. Barton: Were you involved with a death cult then? Toole: No, not then. That was around 1974. I joined the cult in the 1980's, early 80's. I was in it with Henry. Barton: Tell me about it.
Toole: It was The Hand of Death. We were working for that cult and we'd grab little kids for the human sacrifices, grab young women for the snuff movies. We'd tie the women up and haul them to Mexico, only the ones that come out there. I liked working for The Hand of Death. They'd let me have the corpses when they were done with the films or sacrifices and I could take a prime cut. We got most on those people from Texas since it's near the border with Mexico. There were several death cults down there. I heard that a few years ago the police busted one near Matamoros. That wasn't The Hand of Death, it was a different one. Barton: What's a human sacrifice like? Toole: Secret rituals, I can't reveal it to anyone. Barton: Generally. Tell me generally. Toole: Put them on the altar and cut their throat; then make a burnt offering to the Devil. Like that generally. Barton: Who? Women? Kids? Toole: Virgins were preferred. Girls of teenage years. Barton: Virgin sacrifice? Toole: Yeah, slit the throat, collect the blood in a goblet, pass it around and drink it hot. Do chants. It's secret stuff. You aren't supposed to reveal it. They make you take an oath for secrecy. Barton: You drank human blood from a cup? Toole: Yeah, it's in the ritual. Barton: What's it taste like? Toole: Kinda salty. Not so good. I like cooked meat. I didn't mind eating the cooked parts. Barton: Is eating human flesh part of the rituals? Toole: Sometimes. Barton: What parts are ritually eaten? Toole: Well, I'm not allowed to tell about it. Barton: Just tell a little. Toole: We had a ritual where we ate sex parts. Barton: Tell about that. Toole: The women parts were the titty nipples and the hole where the dick goes in. Barton: The vagina. Toole: I guess. It's like a little bag of muscle. Barton: You'd cut out their cunts? Toole: Whatever it's called. A sex part. A hole the woman has. Barton: What about the males? Toole: Cut off the peter, cut off the balls. Barton: You fry it all up? Toole: No, it's put in like a little stew pot. The guy who cooks it makes it like a soup or stew. It's a secret recipe from about a thousand years ago. Barton: Taste good? Toole: Not bad. The part of the woman around the pussyhole is like lips. Sort of chewy and rubbery. The balls are damned good when fried. Use a little batter and a fryer and it's a real treat. Crispy. Like a crispy chestnut. Fresh fried balls is one of my favorites. Barton: What's eating the sex parts supposed to do for you? Toole: Gives you increased sexual potency. Powers. Barton: Right. You believe that? Toole: I don't know. I prefer to eat the ribs actually but I go along with what's being served at the ceremonies. Barton: Where was this weird shit going down, Ottis? Toole: Mexico, a ranch down there. Barton: And these were all virgins you ate and cut up? Toole: I don't know. Me and Henry would drive up to Texas and collect women. Girls. We'd just catch those we come upon. Barton: Tell me about that part.
Toole: Certain times of the year the priests wanted virgins for the human sacrifices. They'd say to me and Henry to go up to Texas and collect some. We'd drive on up, get girls hitch hiking, pick up vans at bars. There are a lot of women just walking down the road in South Texas. Migrant workers. We'd get them, tie them up, gag them, put them in the trunk. We fill the trunk, 6 or 8 girls, then go back to Mexico. Down at the ranch the priests check them for virgins. Barton: How did they check? Toole: Took down their pants and looked at that hole. The hole is smaller on virgins. Something about that hole, I'm not into women. The priests took the virgins to one building and the non-virgins went to where they made snuff films. Barton: Ever see any of these films being made? Toole: Yeah. Barton: What did you see? Toole: A political movie about Paris, France, in the old days. They had a machine that cut off a woman's head. Barton: A guillotine? Toole: Yeah, I think so. Barton: Tell about it. Toole: The woman is strapped to a board. Her neck is locked in between a thing, her head is sticking out of a hole on the board. A big knife drops and cuts off her head. The head falls into a basket. Barton: You watched? Toole: Yeah, it was interesting. Her name was Charlotte. Barton: You knew her name? Toole: Her movie name, I guess. She was political. Broke some law, so they cut off her head. Blood squirted all over the place. It was an old-timey execution. Barton: Did you sacrifice any virgins? Toole: No, never did. Priests did all that. Barton: You saw it? Toole: Oh sure, we all saw it. Barton: What did you see? Tell how a virgin is sacrificed. Toole: The high priest is dressed in a goat costume. He stands behind the virgin. She's chained belly down to the sacrificial block with her buttocks raised and spread. There is a second high priest who has the knife. They do the chants, ceremonies, the secret things I can't tell about. Then the priest in front pulls the virgins head back by her hair and puts the knife against her throat. The one behind her steps up and puts his dick into her sex hole and when she screams the priest in front slits her throat. It's all secret rites. Barton: How many virgins are sacrificed? Toole: The main ceremony, once a year calls for 13 virgins. That's the big ritual. Usually it's only one virgin. Barton: Do you really expect me to believe you saw 13 virgins sacrificed at one time? There aren't even 13 virgins left in America. Give me a fucking break, Ottis! Toole: It's not all at once. One at a time, all night long because each ceremony, at sundown and the last, at sunrise which is about an hour. The first one is a black girl, she is sacrificed to the prince of darkness at the exact moment of sundown. During the night virgins are sacrificed to specific demons. Those virgins are usually Latinas. The last virgin, the 13th, is sacrificed to Lucifer, Son of the Morning; always a blond girl is used and her throat is cut at sunrise. She's called the Sun Princess. She has two slavegirl attendants who are sacrificed with her, they go with her into the Heart Of The Sun. Barton: Ottis, you're crazy! Toole: The year I first saw the Ceremonies, the Sun Princess was a teenage girl, a white-blond from Houston. Her cult name was "Taireina" which is "Morning Star". The year I saw it the Sun Princess was an American, so was the black girl, the others were Latinas. I saw the rituals. The Hands of Death are a most secret cult; I've already said too much! Barton: You and Lucas were involved in this shit? Toole: Yeah, but Henry wants to deny everything now because he's trying to avoid being executed. I'm too crazy for execution so I can tell you how it really was. Henry killed a lot of people. I know, I was there. I helped him do the murders. Barton: We're running out of time Ottis. Do you have any particularly fond memories of your days together with Henry Lucas? He's the one they made the movie about, not you. He's famous, you're a nobody. A prison faggot. What's your last word? Toole: Henry is going to be executed but I'll be alive surrounded by cute fuck-boys. I have everything I want in prison. Except I miss the freedom to drive down the highway robbing and killing from town to town. That's excitement at its best and miss being able to bar-b-que a boy when I get the urge. I did like to bar-b-que. You can write in your story that anyone who wants to write me and get a recipe for my home made sauce, I'll send it free. Just send a few stamps for the reply letter. That's all honey.
News cache copyright free for Fair Use for non-profit educational use per 17 US Code 107 |