"There's a report out tonight that 24-years ago I was apprehended in Kennebunkport, Maine, for a DUI. That's an accurate story. I'm not proud of that. I oftentimes said that years ago I made some mistakes. I occasionally drank too much and I did on that night. I was pulled over. I admitted to the policeman that I had been drinking. I paid a fine. And I regret that it happened. But it did. I've learned my lesson."
—President George W. Bush, CNN Larry King Live, November 2, 2000 -- George Bush Bush DUI arrest blotter -- Dick Cheney DUI arrests blotter
"I must vigorously dissent from the well-written opinion of the majority, as it seems we are coming perilously close to turning a blind eye to questionable conduct by our police officers. While I acknowledge that our police officers are charged with the awesome and sometimes onerous responsibility of protecting the public, I cannot sanction the whisperings of the majority that that protection comes at the deprivation of the constitutional rights of citizenship. We do not want a police state, and it seems we are on the precipice of becoming one, in the name of DUI. I suggest that the Court, and the police, can ill afford to sanction this type of conduct."
—Pennsylvania Court of Appeals, Martin v. Commonwealth, overturned by Pennsyvania Supreme Court, driver license reinstated for refusal to volunteer for voluntary breath-alcohol test
"Police officers administering tests used to determine whether a motorist is guilty of a serious drunk driving offense may not actually know what they are doing. The Ohio Inspector General yesterday released a scathing report that accused a state highway patrol post of cheating on tests used to certify proficiency with breathalyzer units. 'Cheating, no matter the circumstances, has no place in a law enforcement agency. It cannot be tolerated, encouraged, or condoned.' Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) carries harsh penalties that can cost more than $10,000 in fines and attorney fees. Under current law, a guilty or not guilty verdict often rests solely on the results produced by machines that estimate the amount of alcohol in the blood based upon a breath reading. Police in Ohio may only use these machines if they have up-to-date certification from the state Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Testing, which requires an annual written renewal exam. This cheating was so blatant that five sergeants knew about it, but failed to take any action."
—TheNewspaper.com, "Cops Caught Cheating on DUI Test," 7/17/2008 -- Inspector General Report: Cheating by State Troopers on a State-Administered Exam
"One of the major defects in many methods of blood-alcohol
analysis is the failure to identify ethanol to the exclusion of all other chemical compounds. Thus a client with other compounds in his blood or breath may
have a high 'blood-alcohol' reading with little or no ethanol in his
body. If you look at the warranties - it is sort of interesting - none
of the breath machine manufacturers warrant these things to actually
test blood alcohol."
—Lawrence Taylor, attorney at law,
DUICENTER.COM, Drunk Driving
Defense, 5th Edition (2000)
"Nancy Benoit also had a blood alcohol reading of .184, although Sperry said the blood alcohol and drug levels could be affected by the decomposition of her body. 'These (blood alcohol) results are not reliable for interpretation because the amount of alcohol in her system could have all come from the decomposition.'"
—Cindy Morley, Fayette Daily News, GBI: Chris Benoit's son was full of Xanax, July 18, 2007
"The only reliable test for blood alcohol from a corpse is by drawing the blood directly from the interior chambers of the heart. Otherwise the blood can be contaminated with stomach and intestinal contents from ingested alcohol. This is especially true for crash victims."
—Dr Randall Pedigo MD, Knox County coroner, KPD firearms instructor and expert medical witness, shot 6 times by TBI during raid on his home searching for firearm used by towtrucking carthieves to kill a cop in Knoxville (actual shooter was "suicided" by police state death squad via "lead poisoning" and hanging), convicted of homosexual rape by injection of "vitamin" sedatives, conversation with John Lee of Pirate News and The Prohibition Times
"All propaganda has to be popular and has to adapt its spiritual
level to the perception of the least intelligent of those towards whom it
intends to direct itself. If the German people cannot win, they deserve to
disappear."
—Adolf Hitler Schicklegruber
Rothschild, Jewish Ashkenazi NAZI dictator
"We are hoodwinked, duped more and more every year; we are made to
feel we are free when we are not." —Wassaja
"Strictly speaking, a driver can register a BAC of 0.00% and still be convicted of a DUI. The level of BAC does not clear a driver when it is below the 'presumed level of intoxication.'"
—Tennessee Driver Handbook and Driver License Study Guide
"Interlock technology was developed to keep chronic drunks off of our roads. And when used for that purpose, interlocks are an effective tool. But the neo-prohibitionist movement is slowly redefining 'drunk.' For most people the term 'drunk' means slurred speech, uncoordinated movements, and delayed reactions. But it only takes one drink in many states for a driver to be arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI). And now anti-alcohol activists want to put an ignition interlock in your car. Since the end goal is preventative, rather than punitive technology, the groups are scrapping the term “ignition interlock” in hopes of also ridding their new campaign of its negative associations. In its place, they’ve coined a new name - Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS). Note the use of 'impaired' as 'drunk.' Even though 0.08 BAC is considered the legal limit in all 50 states, many law enforcement agencies have adopted the position that “there is no absolute ‘legal limit’ except ‘zero.’ Universal interlocks could impose de facto prohibition on responsible adults by making it impossible to drive home from a restaurant, ball game, or any social event where beer, wine, spirits are served if you’ve had just a small amount of alcohol. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration administrator Nicole Nason told Automotive News in August 2007 that getting interlock technology every car in America could take decades. But she concluded: 'We have to start now.' “MADD began floating the notion of taking this concept to its logical conclusion: It wants every automobile to come equipped with passive Breathalyzer-like technology that will screen the alcohol level of every driver. Several states, including New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, and Oklahoma, have already considered legislation to mandated interlocks on all vehicles.”
—American Beverage Institute, USA Today with Lindsay Lohan, What if ignition interlocks were installed in every car?
The
Hollywood Movie Starlet - Lindsay Lohan proves medical malpractice of rehab loony bins, which likewise never teach Constitutional Law. Paparazzi aren't the only stalkers as proven by police state death squads cruising parking lots
The
24 Hour Hollywood Movie Star - CIA MKULTRA brainwashed star Kiefer Sutherland volunteers to plead "guilty" to 4th DUI, sentenced to 48 days, which is better than being tortured in Gitmo for 6 years for being a goatherder
The
Little Black Dress - Angie Garbarino got the cop fired so he can't testify in her DUI trial, so she wins for failure to prosecute. She did not volunteer for a BAC test, so there's no evidence against her. Without probable cause testimony by the ex-cop, she can win a lawsuit for false arrest, with the govt paying her legal fees. So getting punched in the face is a great legal defense to DUI.
Police Officer 3 - Sgt Roosevelt Tidwell arrested for pulling couples over with his cruiser and forcing them to engage in sex acts while he masturbated. Not charged with DUI though obviously intoxicated
Judge 2 - Judge Donald D Thompson didn't dispute that he kept a penis pump behind the bench in his courtroom. A jury convicted the judge of four counts of indecent exposure, for masturbating while presiding over trials. Sober as a judge?
Billionaire Jewish Princess - TV star Paris Hilton gets 45 days jail, after cops and judge knock her head off with "probation violation", for the noncrime of "DUI reckless driving". Too bad she didn't read the Prohibition Times. But she will be paid $1-Million profit for her jailhouse diaries! Mexican prosecutor refuses to arrest his Mexican wife on the arrest warrant ordered for crashing on a suspended license.
Porn Star 2 - State trooper shoots videotape while extorting rape from Barbie Cummings. Blowjob defense wins dismissal for 29 defendants in traffic court. Cop fired for raping dozens of women during traffic stops.
DUI Civil
War: The Military Commander - Loony Bin DUI Arrest by Homeland
Security KGB under U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act - Plus
Mass-Murder Mystery as DUI cop is murdered by son of DUI
prosecutor in DUI prosecutor's house that should have resulted to dismissal of DUI
charges against US Air Force wing commander
The General: Thunderbirds Are Go! - 4-star General Merrill McPeak was promoted to chief of staff of the US Air Force by The Prohibition Times. McPeak, as a vehement critic of Israel and Jews in USA for destroying world peace by demanding a 100-year Iraq War that killed over 70,000 US troops so far, agrees with Mel Gibson's alibi: "Mossad Jews set me up!" McPeak was Secretary of the Air Force for Clinton, and campaigned for Bob Dole, Bush Jr and John Kerry, and is Barack Obama's military advisor against Hillary Rodomski Clinton Blythe Rockefeller.
U.S. Supreme Court Family - The daughter of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has been sentenced to 18 months probation after pleading guilty to drunken driving. She was arrested while driving away from a fast-food restaurant when an anonymous informant called police. Banaszewski refused to take a breath test, resulting in an automatic six-month suspension of her driver's license which she didn't contest in March
IF YOU WANT TO PLAY WITH THE BIG BOYS, YOU HAVE
TO KNOW HOW TO PLAY THE GAME
"It seems to me the rulers of the Cherokees have sufficient
intelligence to see the utter imbicility of placing any further reliance
upon the Supreme Court." —Governor Wilson Lumpkin, Georgia 1831
"Let me start with law enforcement conacts with respect to traffic stops, for suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The Fifth amendment of the Bill of Rights states that we are not to be forced to incrimnate ourselves. The actual wording is, you cannot be compelled to be a witness against yourself. If you are stopped for suspicion of DUI, these are your rights regardless of the laws of your state. First of all, you are to deny having consumed any alcoholic beverages whatsoever. You are never to admit to having one or two drinks. If you admit to consuming even one drop of alcohol, you open the door to 'probable cause', allowing the police officer to search your car for open containers. Next, you are never to submit to a Field Sobriety Test. You are to refuse to do so. They cannot make you walk the line, they cannot make you balance or anything else. Now when you are arrested, you are to refuse to allow a blood-alcohol test, regardless of what state law 'requires', such as revocation of driving priveleges for a period of time. That's an attempt to compel you to be a witness against yourself. Supreme Court decisions in this area are very specific with regards to your rights as folows: Lefkowitz vs Turley, and the Fifth Amendment, provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, and permits him to refuse to any any other qustions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings."
—George Gordon Law Hour, The Policeman is not your friend - He is your adversary, October 30, 2007
"I saw two officers as before, who rode up to me, with their
pistols in their hands, said God damn you stop, if go an Inch further,
you are a dead Man, and swore if we did not turn in to that pasture,
they would blow our brains out. Major Mitchel of the 5th Regt clapd his
Pistol to my head, and said he was going to ask me some questions, if I
did not tell the truth, he would blow my brains out. I told him I
esteemed myself a man of truth, that he had stopped me on the highway,
& made me a prisoner, I knew not by what right; I would tell him the
truth; I was not afraid." —Paul Revere, owner of RevereWare¨, sworn affidavit: "Memorandum
on Events of April 18, 1775" (declassified Top Secret), while under
arrest (and subsequent escape) from Redcoat martial-law traffic police
at Minute Man National Historic Park, Paul Revere Capture Site, on the
eve of the American
Revolutionary War and kicking off the Battle of Lexington and Concord,
against the army, navy and courts of King
George III, heriditary dictator of England who attempted "gun
control" by an Assault Weapons Ban
of defensive 50-caliber muskets and cannon, Paul
Revere's Ride, by David Hackett Fischer
"Mr. Speaker, my subject today is whether America is a police
state. If we are, what are we going to do about it? Most police states,
surprisingly, come about through the democratic process with majority
support. The masses are easily led to believe that security and liberty
are mutually exclusive, and demand for security far exceeds that for
liberty. Our government already keeps close tabs on just about
everything we do and requires official permission for nearly all of our
activities. One might take a look at our Capitol for any evidence of a
police state. We see: barricades, metal detectors, police, military
soldiers at times, dogs, ID badges required for every move, vehicles
checked at airports and throughout the Capitol. The people are totally
disarmed, except for the police and the criminals. But worse yet,
surveillance cameras in Washington are everywhere to ensure our safety.
Like gun control, people control hurts law-abiding citizens much more
than the law-breakers. Centralized control and regulations are required
in a police state. Not only do we need a license to drive, but we also
need special belts, bags, buzzers, seats and environmentally dictated
speed limits. Or a policeman will be pulling us over to levy a fine, and
he will be toting a gun for sure. Let's reject the police
state." —Congressman Dr. Ron Paul, MD (R-TX, 1988 Libertarian
Party candidate for President, Landslide GOP candidate for president in 2008), speech in House of Representatives,
United States Congress, "Are
We Doomed To Be a Police State?" June 27, 2002
"The people resemble a wild beast, which, naturally fierce and
accustomed to live in the woods, has been brought up, as it were, in a
prison and in servitude, and having by accident got its liberty, not being
accustomed to search for its food, and not knowing where to conceal
itself, easily becomes the prey of the first who seeks to incarcerate it
again." —Niccolo Machiavelli, Secretary of War (with Leonardo
D'Vinci), Florence, Italy, from The Prince
"Just when you thought the Orwellian Big Brother society couldn't possibly accelerate further, it gets even worse. A move is afoot to force 245 million drivers in America to have alcohol breathalyzers fitted in their vehicles, ignition interlocks that prevent the vehicle from being started by an inebriant. 'The threat of arrest and punishment, for decades the primary tactic against drunken drivers, is no longer working in the struggle to reduce the death toll, officials say, and they are proposing turning to technology — alcohol detection devices in every vehicle — to address the problem,' reports the New York Times."
—Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, PrisonPlanet.com, "Big Brother To Decide If You Drive,", November 20, 2006
"Long Hair [Custer] came. They said we massacred him. Our first
impulse was to escape, but we were so hemmed in we had to fight." —Crazy Horse (he with the best Assault Rifles wins self defense)
"While the actions of the SWAT team do not mandate the suppression of evidence seized from the defendant, those actions as they relate to the bar patrons do merit the condemnation of anyone who believes that this country is not, at least for
the moment, a police state. Nevertheless, without any reasonable, articulable suspicion that any of the customers were armed or dangerous or posed any threat to law enforcement officers, the members of the SWAT team restrained and handcuffed the customers at gun point. If the slightest bit of protest or resistance was offered by the customers, that individual
was, according to Sexton “placed” on the ground through physical force. As I indicated earlier, I am astonished and dismayed over this scenario. I am astonished because for twenty-two years it has been the clearly established constitutional law of this country that the patrons of a business about to be searched may not be subjected to this type of treatment absent
some reasonable and articulable suspicion that those patrons are armed or dangerous. See, Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 (1979). And yet the SWAT team in this case acted in absolute contravention of this constitutional principle. I am dismayed because Officer Sexton, the apparent spokesperson for the SWAT team at the suppression hearing, was not only unremorseful for this sorry business, but indicated that he and his team would do the same thing again. Under the principles of operation for the SWAT team described by Officer Sexton the elderly nursing home
patient, the worshiper and the restaurant diner would all be presumed armed and dangerous, and each would be handcuffed, searched and treated the same as the bar patrons in the instant case. I for one find this possibility profoundly disturbing. Somehow this familiar basic tenet of American civic life has become lost on the authorities conducting the search in this case. One can only hope they become reacquainted with it."
—Judge Jerry L. Smith, Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee at Knoxville, State vs. Norton, No. E2001-01903-CCA-R3-CD, Filed July 18, 2002
"Thousands of alcoholics are seen every year by
professionals—psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, clergy,
counselors, nurses and doctors -- yet, tragically, they are almost always
misdiagnosed and often harmfully treated. It is my belief that alcoholism
has suffered more malpractice out of ignorance than any other disease in
recent times." —Mel Schulstad, past president of the National
Association of Alcoholism Counselors, from Under
the Influence, by Dr. James Milam and Katherine Ketcham
"The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. Using Leape's 1997 medical and drug error rate would add another 216,000 deaths, for a total of 999,936 deaths annually. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US."
—Gary Null, PhD; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; Dorothy Smith, PhD, Life Extension Magazine, "Death by Medicine", March 2004 (plus 1.5-Million annual aborticides in USA)
"But the renowned Minnesota Model has its critics, who cite recovery rates of 25 percent or less for conventional treatment programs. One of its most vocal critics is Dr. Joan Mathews-Larson, PhD, founder of Health Recovery Center (HRC), a Minneapolis-based program which has treated several thousand alcoholics and addicts since 1981, using a method based on 'biochemical repair,' rather than talk therapy. Claiming recovery rates of around 75 percent, Mathews-Larson contends traditional treatment programs fail to address biochemical factors that cause chemically dependent people to crave alcohol and/or drugs. Mathews-Larson became involved in the issue in the late 1970's, after her 17-year-old son Rob committed suicide soon after completing alcoholism treatment at a Minneapolis rehab center. Not long before his death, Mathews-Larson suspected her son's post-treatment depression and mood swings might be linked to his consumption of high-sugar foods. Testing by a physician confirmed her son was hypoglycemic. After earning her certificate as a substance-abuse counselor, Mathews-Larson conducted research at a local treatment center showing an 80 percent incidence of hypoglycemia in chemically dependent patients. Other researchers have reported similar data, noting that alcohol is a concentrated form of sugar. Gathering other researchers' findings on the physiology of alcoholism, she designed a program using amino acids, essential fatty acids, vitamins and minerals to replace the natural brain chemicals destroyed by alcohol and drugs. Mathews-Larson's book Seven Weeks To Sobriety, first published in 1992, has sold more than 100,000 copies in the U.S. and abroad. Health Recovery Center has been featured on a number of national TV and radio programs, including ABC's 20/20, America's Talking, and the syndicated Susan Powter Show. (Exercise and diet guru Powter is a former HRC patient who published her own book on a similar biochemical recovery method last year.) Traditional treatment programs "all over the U.S. and Canada" have been purchasing HRC's detox formula 'in huge amounts,' Mathews-Larson said."
—Dan Emerson, Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal, "Recovery clinics disagree on how to beat an addictionAlternative and western medicine clash over treatment of drug and alcohol abuse," December 11, 1998
GW Bush worshipping his Higher Power at Bohemian Grove with Bill Clinton-Blythe III (Rockefeller)
"Addiction is hard to overcome. As you might remember, I drank too much at one time in my life. I understand addiction, and I understand how a changed heart can help you deal with addiction. First is to recognize that there is a higher power. It helped me in my life. It helped me quit drinking."
—President George W. Bush, Episcopal Community Services Jericho Program, January 30, 2008
“The addict has been found not to want to be an addict, but is driven by pain and environmental hopelessness. As soon as an addict can feel healthier and more competent mentally and physically without drugs than he does on drugs, he ceases to require drugs.”
—L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Narconon drug detox/rehab centers, founder of the Church of Scientology, author of Dianetics
"It is the ultimate vampirism, the ultimate mindfuk, instead of going for blood, you're going for their soul. And you take drugs in order to reach that state where you can, quite literally, like a psychic hammer, break their soul, and pull the power through. He designed his Scientology Operating Thetan techniques to do the same thing. But, of course, it takes a couple of hundred hours of auditing and mega-thousands of dollars for the privilege of having your head turned into a glass Humpty Dumpty --shattered into a million pieces. It may sound like incredible gibberish, but it made my father a fortune. Also, you've got to realize that my father did not worship Satan. He thought he was Satan. He was one with Satan. He had a direct pipeline of communication and power with him. My father wouldn't have worshiped anything. I mean, when you think you're the most powerful being in the universe, you have no respect for anything, let alone worship."
—L. Ron Hubbard Jr, Penthouse, "Inside The Church of Scientology," June 1983
THE OTHER DWI PROHIBITION—THE SO-CALLED WAR ON
DRUGS
"Our system of justice has been perverted, that [our covert
intelligence agencies] had converted themselves into channels for the flow
of drugs into the United States." —Senator John Kerry (presidential
candidate 2004), 35 volume set in your local law library, Senate Committee
on Iran-Contra Matters
"You might as well expect rivers to run backward as
that any man who was born a free man should be contented when penned up
and denied liberty." —Chief Joseph
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can
shield the people from the political, economic and/or military
consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State
to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal
enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest
enemy of the State." —Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels, NAZI Minister of
Propaganda (who murdered his wife and 5 little girls as Russian Army
closed in on Hitler's bunker in Berlin, to avoid the Death Penalty and
hangman's noose)
"It's easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the
government might legitimately give out false information. It's an
unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete information and even
misinformation by government may sometimes be perceived as necessary to
protect vital interests." —US Solicitor-General Theodore "Ted
Bundy" Olson, Harbury vs. United
States, US Supreme Court, 17 March 2002 (Olson's 3rd wife Barbara,
an ex-federal prosecutor and CNN pundit, was allegedly murdered on the
invisible American
Airlines Flight 77 that didn't crash into the Pentagon on September
11, 2001). Mrs. Harbury argued her case pro se to the US Supreme Court
regarding the US CIA murdering her husband in Central America back during
Bush Sr's
Iran-Contra narcoterrorism trials and convictions (35 volume Kerry US
Senate report in your local public law libraries, plus many lawsuits,
including Christic Institute RICO class action vs. Bush Sr. White House).
The Bush Jr. White House is
sued by families of the victims of the massacres of 9-11, under the RICO
Act, for perping the treasonous terror massacres, and are seeking
indictments and arrests of President George Bush Jr. (who is already a
5-time-convicted felon) and his entire staff.
"Drunk driving is a political crime. Unless you understand that and
I mean a political crime as we know it today. I see lots of nods out
there. Unless you understand that, unless you have that perspective; that
you are dealing with a political crime, you are not going to be able to
effectively defend a client. You are not going to be able to effectively
approach the so called 'scientific evidence' either the magic box or field
sobriety tests or horizontal gaze nystagmus or anything else. You must
develop that perspective. Many of you sense that there's something
wrong--that this particular offense is a little different from other
criminal offenses, but you still approach it as a criminal defense
attorney, rather than as a DUI attorney. It's important for you to
understand and have perspective on what you're dealing with when you go
into a DUI case. We've talked about the Constitutional projections and, by
the way, what happens in the DUI field--and this is where we are losing
our rights, this is where we're losing our rights. What happens today is
going to happen tomorrow in other types of offenses. Roadblocks today for
DUI. Roadblocks tomorrow for everything else. It's called precedent. Now
let's talk about the third area that I'm supposed to talk about today.
That is the area of scientific evidence. I use the term scientific very
advisedly. Okay, so to attack DUI scientific evidence, you have to
understand what you're dealing with. When you're dealing with these
quasi-scientific field sobriety tests and these magic boxes, you're
talking about the difference between truth and expediency or imposition of
order. The system, the legal system, is not concerned with truth. The
defense is truth. It's truth. What a mind-boggling concept to a criminal
defense lawyer! Think about it. You're criminal defense lawyers. The other
side, you know, they've got the eyewitnesses, they've got the
fingerprints, they've got the cop-out confession. What are you there for?
To blow smoke and raise reasonable doubt, right? You have been trained
that way. That's how you pursue and defend your cases. DUI isn't like
that. DUI is different. What's different is they're the ones who are
blowing smoke. They're the ones that are palming off false science.
They're the ones that are palming off this field sobriety crap. You are
the ones who are trying to point out to the jury what the truth is. That
these--this is not science. This is not true, it is false. This is
difficult for some of you to comprehend, that you are interested in
bringing truth to the jury in a DUI case. And that is a pretty darn
important perspective. I think it's a pretty neat thing. A lot of people
ask me why the heck do you defend drunk drivers and nothing else? And I've
been doing it for a long time now. Because, two real reasons, one; I
firmly believe we are the people at the dam with our fingers in that crack
in the dike when it comes to constitutional protection. This is where
we're losing it. Two; I like, I really like the feeling that I'm trying to
bring the truth to a jury. Long ago I got tired of trying to blow smoke
and raise reasonable doubt. I like truth. You've got to understand that is
what you are trying to do. You are trying to develop truth. You're trying
to get the jury educated to what really is happening. To debunk this false
science. Okay, this is the kind of machine that we've got and by the way,
understand something else that is critically important for you to impart
to the jury. Not only are these things inaccurate, not only does the
manufacturer have no confidence in them, but they don't measure alcohol.
Right. They don't measure alcohol. Please, by a show of hands, how
many people here know what I'm talking about? Ladies and gentlemen, this
machine does not measure alcohol! What it measures is any compound that
has the methyl group in it. It's a stupid machine, okay? Their expert will
call it a smart machine--state-of-the-art. Smart, meaning it's
self-diagnostic and so on. It's a stupid machine. It does not recognize
alcohol when it sees it. It does not measure
alcohol." —Lawrence Taylor, attorney at law, DUICENTER.COM,
audiotape trascript: "Attacking
Blood-Alcohol Evidence"
"While most Americans might believe judges are expected to consider all cases with equal impartiality, a prominent judicial standards organization suggests courts should treat differently any case involving driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The group is now working in concert with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to promote 'efficient disposal of traffic cases.' The center opened a website covering 'The Court's Role in Reducing the Incidence of Impaired Driving' as a well-documented multimedia resource. It urges lower court judges to adopt advocacy or "problem solving" roles. 'In DWI cases, courts can have a much broader role than in many other types of cases,' the site teaches. This is evident when the court explains to law enforcement procedural shortcomings following unsuccessfully prosecuted cases." Leading California DUI legal expert Lawrence Taylor, author of DUI Blog, believes the National Center for State Courts has crossed the line into improper conduct. 'I guess high conviction rates, draconian sentences and turning a blind eye to constitutional violations helps establish that tone,' Taylor wrote. 'After 39 years of practice, I can still remember when judges were supposed to be impartial, even in drunk driving cases.' Impartiality is essential when sober motorists end up falsely accused of DUI and receive no compensation for legal expenses if found innocent, as has happened in Arizona, Oregon, Washington DC, Florida, Maine and Texas. Other individuals have been convicted by judges of "driving under the influence" without any automobiles involved. In Virginia, a man was convicted for riding a lawnmower while drunk, a Georgia woman for riding a horse, a North Carolina man for riding a scooter and a New Jersey man for riding a toy mini-motorcycle. Courts in New Jersey and Minnesota insist you can be arrested for driving under the influence in a parked car. NHTSA confirmed the effort to apply DUI standards to incidents that do not involve drunk driving. It created an advertising campaign in 2005 specifically targeted drivers who were not drunk, but had consumed "a small amount of alcohol." These efforts can generate a tremendous amount of revenue for cities and police officers. A Houston, Texas police officer was paid $172,576 in 2005 primarily by earning overtime on a DUI task force. That same year, Albuquerque, New Mexico generated $1 million from DUI seizures and fines."
—TheNewspapeer.com "Judges Taught to Help Prosecutors in DUI Cases," 7/30/2008
"The Supreme Court of Canada last week ruled to exclude scientific evidence from trials that involving driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The case considered the accuracy of the breathalyzer readings used to convict two motorists.
Robert Albert Gibson had produced a breathalyzer reading that estimated his blood alcohol content (BAC) at .12 and then .10 in a subsequent test. Martin Foster MacDonald blew a .146. At the time the breathalyzer test was administered, each was over the .08 limit. However, because it takes time for the body to absorb the alcohol and cause impairment, the defendants argued that it was possible that they were sober at the time they had been behind the wheel. Expert scientific witnesses backed up the defendants with evidence based on the average absorption and elimination rate of alcohol. At the time Gibson and MacDonald were actually driving, their BAC could have been as low as .40 and as high as .10 -- the range straddled the .08 limit. [They were aquitted in the first trial, and the aquittal was upheld by the Candian Supreme court, but an Appeals Court overturned the Supreme Court and ordered a new trial, which they lost.] Their convictions were upheld [in the second trial] because the court ruled that the possibility that the BAC could have been lower than .08 raises no reasonable doubt. California DUI attorney Lawrence Taylor said the ruling sets troubling precedent mirrors several US decisions. 'In other words, the defendant is not permitted to question the Breathlayzer results -- because it interferes with efforts to combat drunk driving,' Taylor said. 'Think about that.'"
—TheNewspaper.com, Canadian Supreme Court Eliminates DUI Defense, 25 April 2008 - R. v. Gibson, Supreme Court of Canada, 4/24/2008
PayNoFine.com
- FREE E-book for traffic ticket defense
Answer
to Civil Complaint in Traffic Court - Use to fight fraud in Traffic
Court scams and use Homestead Exemption to eliminate paying all traffic
citations even if you lose in court!
Gordon Law
Hour - Excellent self-help legal radio show with internet stream and
FREE audio archive
Legally Speaking - Super high-powered
AM radio show with a panel of lawyers broadcast from Nashville,
Tennessee on Saturday nights
DWI
RESEARCH LIBRARY, Beaulier Law Offices, Minnesota. Maury D.
Beaulier, Esq., was raised in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Prior to his legal
career, he worked as an intern for Congressman Les Aspin, head of the
Armed Service Committee of Congress and later appointed as the United
State's Secretary of Defense. Drunk driving laws of 50 states (Nat'l
Comm. Against Drunk Driving). FAA Federal Laws for Pilots.
AmericanAutobahn.com - As seen on History Channel TV at a LEGAL 212mph on a public highway
DealsGapDragon.com - 636 turns in every 22-mile lap on US129 in Deals Gap, North Carolina. Winning pro se legal defenses for all traffic citations
Car Theft Mafia - How to locate stolen vehicles, plus class actions and criminal prosecutions of the towtrucking chopshop cartel
Pirate News TV - Uncensored cable access and worldwide internet TV
Law Office of James H. Snyder,
Jr. Criminal defense (DUI, drug, misdemeanors and felonies) and
family law (both contested and uncontested divorce, custody and
visitation, child support, and adoption) cases. Located in Blount County
in East Tennessee, and routinely handles cases in Knox, Loudon, Monroe,
and Roane Counties.
Beer Diet - Drinking 12 beers every day has zero calories
PERSONAL INJURY:
"A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist
state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with
the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of
opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our
American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. They extended aid to
help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it
there." —William E. Dodd, U.S. Ambassador to Germany, 1937
DWI
RESEARCH LIBRARY, Beaulier Law Offices, Minnesota. Maury D.
Beaulier, Esq., was raised in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Prior to his legal
career, he worked as an intern for Congressman Les Aspin, head of the
Armed Service Committee of Congress and later appointed as the United
State's Secretary of Defense. Drunk driving laws of 50 states (Nat'l
Comm. Against Drunk Driving). FAA Federal Laws for Pilots.
"Go, eat your food with gladness, and drink your wine
with a joyful heart, for it is now that God favors what you
do." —King Soloman, Ecclesiastes 9:7 (NIV666 Bible)
JOKE OF THE DAY
Satan was being expelled from Heaven. As he passed
through the Gates, he paused a moment in thought, turned to God and said,
I hear a new creature called Man is soon to be created. This is true, God
replied. He will need laws, said the Demon slyly, prompting God to
indignantly exclaim, What! You, his appointed Enemy for all Time! You ask
for the right to make his laws? Oh, no! Satan replied, I ask only that he
be allowed to make his own. It was so granted. —Ambrose Bierce
